|
Medtronic received a report that a pipeline flex did not open during a procedure.The patient was undergoing treatment of a medium unruptured saccular right anterior communicating artery aneurysm, measuring 15.67mm x 12.22mm.Landing zone distal 4.12mm, proximal 4.20.The vessel was observed moderately tortuous.Reported device and any accessory devices were prepared as indicated in the ifu.A continuous flush was maintained.It was reported that during the procedure, the pipeline flex was advanced through a marksman with resistance.At deployment, the tip of the pipeline flex did not open.The device was attempted to be resheathed, with was unsuccessful.The system was removed.After removal, it was found that the tip of the pipeline flex had burrs and the microcatheter was also damaged.There were not any patient symptoms or complications associated with this event.
|
|
D10: device available for evaluation - additional information g4.Date mfr rec ¿ additional information h2: type of follow up - device evaluation h3: device evaluated by manufacturer- additional information h6: codes updated the device was returned for evaluation and the clinical observation could not be confirmed.As received, the pipeline flex appeared to be stuck at the distal segment of the medtronic catheter.For further examination, the pipeline flex was then pushed out from the catheter lumen with difficulty.The distal and proximal ends of the pipeline flex braid were found fully opened and moderately frayed.Bend found on the pusher at the proximal end.No damages were found with the tip coil, distal marker, re-sheathing marker or with the proximal bumper.The distal and proximal dps restraints were found to be intact.The dps sleeves were found intact with no signs of damage.The distal hypotube appeared to be stretched with the ptfe shrink tubing still intact.Based on the analysis findings, the distal and proximal ends of the pipeline flex braid appeared to be fully opened and moderately frayed.From the damages seen on the pusher (bending), pipeline flex braid (fraying) and hypotube (stretching); it appears there was high force used.It is likely these damages occurred when the customer attempted to advance the pipeline flex through the medtronic catheter against resistance.It is likely that the patient tortuous anatomy may have contributed to the resistance during delivery.Per our instructions for use (ifu): "begin to deliver the device using a combination of unsheathing the pipeline flex embolization device and pushing delivery wire simultaneously.After the distal end of the pipeline flex embolization device has successfully expanded, deploy the remainder of pipeline flex embolization device by pushing the delivery wire and/or unsheathing the pipeline flex embolization device.Resheathing and/or manipulation of the micro catheter, by locking down the delivery wire and moving both as a system, may facilitate expansion of the pipeline flex embolization device.The system is designed to allow for 2 full cycles of re-sheathing of the pipeline flex embolization device.Re-sheathing the pipeline flex embolization device more than 2 full cycles may cause damage to the distal or proximal ends of the braid.Discontinue delivery of the device if high force or excessive friction is encountered.Identify the cause of the resistance and remove device and microcatheter simultaneously.Advancement of the ped against resistance may result in device damage or patient injury.Never advance or withdraw an intralumenal device against resistance until the cause of resistance is determined by fluoroscopy.If the cause cannot be determined, withdraw the catheter.Movement of the micro catheter against resistance may result in damage to the micro catheter, or the vessel.Do not use in patients in whom the angiography demonstrates the anatomy is not appropriate for endovascular treatment, due to conditions such as severe intracranial vessel tortuosity or stenosis.¿ medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|