The reported event could be confirmed, since the date of implantation exceeds the date of expiry, as indicated in device history of implant.The device inspection was not possible as the product was not returned for investigation.In the event description it's mentioned that: ¿the surgeon reported that he implanted a supracondylar nail into a patient which had expired in (b)(6) 2019.The surgeon was aware that the implant was past its expiry date at the point of implantation, but there was no alternative available.¿ based on investigation, the root cause was attributed to a user related issue.The failure was caused because user did not adhere to the pre-operative instructions and ifu (instructions for use).A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.No indications of manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.The ifu states: ¿for detailed information concerning the identification of the product (such as system association, catalog no.(ref), material, expiration date of sterile products) please refer to the marking on the product and/or the labeling of the package.Pre-operative: the implant is for single use only.Ensure that all components needed for the operation are available in the operation theatre.Inspection is recommended prior to surgery to determine if instruments or implants have been damaged during storage or prior procedures." if the device is returned or if any additional information is provided, the investigation will be reassessed.
|