|
An event regarding crack/fracture involving an exeter stem was reported.The event was confirmed through clinician review of the provided medical records.Method & results: product evaluation and results: visual inspection was performed as part of the material analysis report (mar), dated 17 september 2019.This inspection indicated: the stem fractured approximately 3.1 inches from the distal tip.Damage was observed on the stem consistent with the cement-mantle breakdown process in addition to the explantation process.The distal fracture surface was obscured by post fracture abrasion, no further analysis was performed.Macroscopic surface features on the proximal fracture surface indicate that the fracture initiated on the posterior side of the lateral surface and propagated medially.A material analysis has been performed.The report concluded: the stem fractured in fatigue with the final fracture occurring in overload.Eds showed the stem was consistent with an astm f1586 alloy.Based on the given information, no identifiable materials or manufacturing discrepancies were observed on the surfaces examined.Medical records received and evaluation: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant stated the following comment: x-ray confirms fractured stem, need additional information; primary and revision operative reports, clinical and past medical history, additional serial dated x-rays and examination of explanted components.Product history review: a review of the device manufacturing records indicate that all devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: the clinician review of the provided x-ray confirms stem fracture.Visual inspection was performed as part of the material analysis report (mar), dated 17 september 2019.This inspection indicated: the stem fractured approximately 3.1 inches from the distal tip.Damage was observed on the stem consistent with the cement-mantle breakdown process in addition to the explantation process.The distal fracture surface was obscured by post fracture abrasion, no further analysis was performed.Macroscopic surface features on the proximal fracture surface indicate that the fracture initiated on the posterior side of the lateral surface and propagated medially.A material analysis has been performed.The report concluded: the stem fractured in fatigue with the final fracture occurring in overload.Eds showed the stem was consistent with an astm f1586 alloy.Based on the given information, no identifiable materials or manufacturing discrepancies were observed on the surfaces examined.The exact cause of the event could not be confirmed as insufficient information was provided.Further information such as primary and revision operative reports, clinical and past medical history and additional serial dated x-rays are required to complete the investigation for determining a root cause.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If devices and / or additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
|