• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MENTOR TEXAS MEDIUM HEIGHT TE 550CC; EXPANDER, SKIN, INFLATABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MENTOR TEXAS MEDIUM HEIGHT TE 550CC; EXPANDER, SKIN, INFLATABLE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 3548214
Medical Device Problem Code Material Rupture (1546)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Code Available (3191)
Date of Event 07/10/2019
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: deflation.Reporter phone number: (b)(4).Manufacturer¿s reference number (b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a (b)(6) year-old female patient underwent a primary breast reconstruction surgery with mentor tissue expander, medium height te 550cc implants which the right side deflated after implantation.The issue was discovered on the day of the surgery.As a result patient had the device removed and replaced with implant on (b)(6) 2019.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
On 8/15/2019, the mentor failure analysis lab has received the device for evaluation.The analysis has begun but is not complete at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation summary: the analysis results showed that the device appeared intact.Leak testing revealed there were two (2) tears (a, b) located at the anterior view measurement approximately less than 0.1 cm (a) and less than 0.1 cm (b).Microscopic examination was performed.No evidence of instrument damage was observed.No other anomalies were discovered.It should be noted that as part of our quality process, each device is visually inspected during manufacturing to ensure the device meets the required specifications prior to shipment.All the implants are 100% inspected before leaving the facility.There is no evidence that the issue is related with manufacturing breast implants are not considered lifetime devices and deflation is a known complication associated with these devices and is referenced in our product insert data sheet.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MEDIUM HEIGHT TE 550CC
Common Device Name
EXPANDER, SKIN, INFLATABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MENTOR TEXAS
3041 skyway circle north
irving TX 75038
MDR Report Key8841535
Report Number1645337-2019-16110
Device Sequence Number16967620
Product Code LCJ
UDI-Device Identifier00081317006558
UDI-Public00081317006558
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2018
Device Explanted Year2019
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source foreign,health professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 07/10/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/30/2019
Device Catalogue Number3548214
Device Lot Number6920276
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/15/2019
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/10/2019
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/15/2019
09/10/2019
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/30/2019
Supplement Report FDA Received Date09/10/2019
10/02/2019
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age58 YR
-
-