|
|
| Catalog Number |
0115816 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Adhesion(s) (1695); Pain (1994); Injury (2348); Disability (2371)
|
| Date of Event |
04/11/2014
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made regarding the bard/davol kugel patch (device #1) used to treat the patient.No lot number has been provided therefore a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard/davol kugel patch (device #1).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol ventrio st (device #2).Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol kugel hernia patch (device #1) and an unspecified bard/davol ventrio st (device #2) on (b)(6) 2013.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the kugel hernia patch (device #1) and the ventrio st (device #2).As reported, the attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient.".
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made regarding the bard/davol kugel patch (device 1) used to treat the patient.No lot number has been provided therefore a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: h11: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided and to correct the brand name root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-oct-2013) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, a4, b2, b3, b4, b5, b7,d3, d4 (product catalog no., udi no., expiry date, corporate lot no.), d6b (date of explant), g1, g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10, h11.Corrected field: d1 (brand name).This supplemental emdr represents the bard/davol¿modified kugel patch (device 1).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol - ventrio st (device 2).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text: not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol kugel hernia patch (device 1) and an unspecified bard/davol ventrio st (device 2) on (b)(6) 2013.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the kugel hernia patch (device 1) and the ventrio st (device 2).As reported, the attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2013 - patient was diagnosed with ventral incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of modified kugel patch.Per operative notes, ¿the complex hernia sac was dissected to the level of fascia and excised.They were converted into solitary defect and modified kugel patch was placed in the peritoneal cavity tacked and sutured.¿ (b)(6) 2014 - patient had adhesion and pain thereby underwent open repair with removal of previously placed mesh.Per operative notes, ¿the previously placed mesh was excised and omental adhesions to this mass was removed and fascia was closed with sutures.¿.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|