|
It was reported that during an unknown procedure regarding a patient of unknown gender and age, a sheath separation occurred on a gunther tulip vena cava filter retrieval set.The blue outer sheath separated from the hub of the device.According to the initial reporter, the device was removed all at once.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Event summary: it was reported that during an unknown procedure regarding a patient of unknown gender and age, a sheath separation occurred on a gunther tulip vena cava filter retrieval set.The blue outer sheath separated from the hub of the device.According to the initial reporter, the device was removed all at once.Investigation - evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record, documentation, instructions for use, manufacturing instructions, and specifications of the device were conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was not returned; therefore, no physical examinations could be performed.A photo was provided by the user facility, however, which confirmed that the hub had separated from the blue retrieval sheath.Additionally, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device history record shows one nonconforming event which could have contributed to this failure mode.The affected product was subsequently scrapped.It should be noted there were no other reported complaints for this lot number.Reviews of specifications and manufacturing instructions were also conducted, and no gaps were discovered.The available information provides objective evidence to support that the device was manufactured to specification.The device is packaged with instructions for use, which warn that excessive force should not be used to retrieve the filter.Based on the information provided, investigation has concluded that, while a definitive cause for the device failure could not be established, the device may have been pulled with excessive force during filter retrieval, as warned against in the instructions for use.We will continue our monitoring of similar complaints and have notified the appropriate personnel of this event.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|