|
The reported speedlock device, intended for use in treatment, was not returned for evaluation.A relationship between the product and reported incident cannot be established as the product was not returned.Without the reported product a visual and functional evaluation cannot be performed and customer¿s complaint cannot be confirmed.From the information provided, ¿almost a year and a half after a right hip arthroscopy labral repair/cam debridement the patient began experiencing pain.(¿) after an mri a hip arthroscopy was performed, at this point the anterior anchor was found to be unstable.The device was retrieved and labral debridement was performed.¿ an exact root cause cannot be determined without evaluation of the device; however, factors unrelated to the manufacture or design of the device that could have contributed to the reported event include: (1) bone quality (2) bone hole size.The instruction for use was reviewed and found to outline precautionary statements and instructions in regards to the use of the device to avoid damage or non-functionality.The instruction for use states: do not implant the anchor in poor quality bone or where bone quantity is limited.The anchor bone hole must be drilled at least to the point that the proximal edge of the depth mark on the drill is subcortical.Failure to do so may result in a bone hole that is too shallow or too deep and may compromise device integrity.Potential complications associated with the use of this device may include pain, infection, reaction to device materials, anchor pullout or migration, bone damage or fracture, injury to surrounding tissues, blood clotting, nerve injury, implant or treatment failure, secondary surgical interventions may include removal of implant, placement of new or additional implant(s).There were no indications during manufacturing record review that would suggest that the device did not meet product specifications upon release into distribution.
|