| Model Number |
M0068311350 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
| Date of Event |
06/27/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).The device has been received for analysis.Upon completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a capio cl device was used during a suburethral sling placement with anterior and posterior repair procedure performed on (b)(6) 2019.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the device was correctly fired once.However, when deploying the capio device on the patient's left side, the dart detached from the suture.Reportedly, there were two darts that detached from the sutures.An x-ray was subsequently performed and the radiologist could not locate any dart inside the patient.The procedure was completed with another capio cl device.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be good.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a capio cl device was used during a suburethral sling placement with anterior and posterior repair procedure performed on (b)(6) 2019.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the device was correctly fired once.However, when deploying the capio device on the patient's left side, the dart detached from the suture.Reportedly, there were two darts that detached from the sutures.An x-ray was subsequently performed and the radiologist could not locate any dart inside the patient.The procedure was completed with another capio cl device.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be good.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Blocks f10 and h6: device code 2907 captures the reportable event of dart detachment.Block h10: visual analysis showed that the cage was bent and no remains of the dart were found inside the cage.Functional analysis revealed that the carrier was actuated three times and it could be extended and retracted without any issues and no conditions that could contribute to the reported issue were found.However, it was actuated with the suture and the needle does not entered in the slot cage.A review of the device history record (dhr) indicated that the device met all material, assembly, and product specifications at the time of release to distribution.The investigation determines that the most probable cause is adverse event related to procedure, since the issue occurred during the procedure and there is no evidence that the device had influence on it.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|