• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. URETERO-RENO FIBERSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. URETERO-RENO FIBERSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number URF-P6R
Device Problem Use of Device Problem (1670)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The referenced scope was returned to service for evaluation.The evaluation confirmed the reported "the doctor burned the tip of the scope when using a laser".A visual inspection was performed and a burn mark was found on the distal end body at the channel opening.The burn at the tip was produced by a laser as stated in the complaint.In addition, the bending section skeleton was fond protruding through the bending section cover approximately 70 mm from the distal end with metal exposed causing a leak.The bending section cover was removed in order to verify the extent of the bending section damage.The bending section skeleton was fully separated producing sharp edge near the insertion tube side.The bending section support pins are still intact and not lifting.Further findings include: a failed leak test at the seam of the distal end body, a dent on the insertion tube, broken fibers scattered throughout the image, and a collapsed biopsy channel.The damage is located in the same vicinity as the broken bending section skeleton.The lead biomedical engineer at the user facility further reported the broken bending section was observed during reprocessing.The facility has received the ¿instructions for safe use¿ manual and performed the inspections according to the manual.A leak test was performed prior to procedure.Based on the evaluation, the cause of the bending section skeleton breaking is potentially due to excessive stress or impact to the bending section.The instruction manual states the following; ¿do not twist or bend the bending section with your hands.Equipment damage may result¿.Additionally, the instructions for safe use manual indicate that, damage to the bending section would happen if excessive force was applied while angulating in the opposite direction if there was no movement from the bending section; this would occur more so in a narrow environment.
 
Event Description
The manufacturer was informed that during the middle of a procedure, the doctor burned the tip of the scope while using a laser.There was no issue withdrawing the scope from the patient.There was no delay and outcome of the procedure was good as the procedure was completed using another scope.There was no patient injury reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
URETERO-RENO FIBERSCOPE
Type of Device
URETERO-RENO FIBERSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP.
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8 507
JA  192-8507
Manufacturer Contact
kazutaka matsumoto
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8-507
JA   192-8507
426425177
MDR Report Key8848744
MDR Text Key203152391
Report Number8010047-2019-02774
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FGB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K172298
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/31/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/31/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberURF-P6R
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/05/2019
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received07/03/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-