|
Reporter is a synthes employee.The device was received, the investigation is in progress, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.A review of the device history record.Device history lot.Part number: 399.575, lot number: t966630, manufacturing site: tuttlingen, release to warehouse date: 04-jul-2011.A review of the device history records was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformances were identified.Investigation summary investigation site: cq zuchwil selected flow: damaged: visual | examples: deformed/bent/cracked/broken visual inspection: there is a round fragment of about 2 mm length broken off at the cutting edge of the received chisel blade.The fragment was not returned for evaluation.Otherwise is the chisel is a good condition, the cutting edge is sharp with no visible damages.Dimensional inspection: the review of the complaint history has shown that this is the first complaint for part 399.575, based on that a design related issue can be excluded.Summary: the complained breakage can be confirmed as a fragment is broken off.The complained wear cannot be confirmed, the cutting edge is sharp as required.During the investigation no manufacturing related issue could be detected.The device was manufactured in july 2011 and we are not aware of any other complaint for the affected lot t966630.There was no information provided how or when the breakage occurred, therefore the exact root cause cannot be defined.The round appearance of the breakage could be an indication for an metallic contact, for example a with a guide wire.Such a contact could cause a mechanical overload and finally the breakage in the contact area.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed as no product related issue could be detected.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|