| Model Number |
HL2L |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2019, the patient came in with a large hammerlock (2) implant inside her toe that had been broken.The original date of the implant was on (b)(6) 2018.There was no plan of removing the implant.This report is for one (1) hammerlock 2 implant kit.This is report 1 of 1 for complaint (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.H11 (corrected data): b1, b5, h1: the initial complaint was reviewed and found not reportable.Pec code updated to reflect a non complaint as this complaint is a duplicate of (b)(4).Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.H3, h6: visual inspection: visual analysis of the x-ray image provided by sales consultant.Visual review of the profile image suggests break occurred approximately in the midpoint of device at point of minimum thickness.Based on this analysis, the complaint condition could be confirmed (broken 2+ pieces postoperatively).The profile image suggest break occurred approximately in the midpoint of device.Dimensional inspection: dimensional inspection could not be performed as the device was not returned.However, visual review of the topographical image suggests appropriate implant shape with no obvious abnormalities.Document/ specification review: no manufacturing related issues were identified and/or confirmed during x-ray analysis.Manufacturing record evaluation could not be completed because the lot number was unknown.Investigation conclusion: the complaint is confirmed.The x-rays show both a topographical and profile image of the patient & device.The x-rays show postoperative hammertoe/claw toe malformation present in the toe of the patient with the device.Instructions for use for hammerlock 2 devices indicate immobilization of the treatment site must be maintained throughout the healing process.If immobilization was not maintained, this could impart forces in the direction of the break however the risk of implant malfunction due to patient noncompliance could not be assessed based on information provided.No further corrective action will be implemented in response to this event as relation of the complaint event to device design and/or manufacturing could not be established.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|