|
It was reported via literature entitled: impact of stapled haemorrhoidopexy on stool continence and anorectal function¿long-term follow-up of 242 patients.Authors: stefan riss, philipp riss, michael schuster, thomas riss.Citation: langenbecks arch surg.2008; 393: 501¿505.Doi: 10.1007/s00423-007-0257-3.Several studies have proved the feasibility and safety of stapled anopexy for treating hemorrhoidal prolapse.However, stool urgency and fecal incontinence as possible side effects are still debated.The present study was designed to assess the impact of longo¿s procedure on stool continence and anorectal function.From 1999 to 2005, a total of 242 patients (100 female and 142 male patients; age range: 29 to 94 years) underwent stapled hemorrhoidopexy for symptomatic hemorrhoidal prolapse.During the surgical procedure, the anus is gently dilated by using the obturator.Perianal traction sutures are inserted at 3, 6, 9 and 12 o¿clock to fix the cad 33 circular anal dilatator (ethicon).By means of a psa 33 special side open anoscope (ethicon), a purse string suture is inserted into the mucous membrane of the distal rectum, about 2¿3 cm above the hemorrhoidal tissue.Using a pph 01 circular stapler device (ethicon), a mucosal doughnut is resected.The resulting stapler line is situated approximately 2 cm above the dentate line.Reported complications included bleeding (n-3) which required re-operation, anal stenosis (n-2) and were dilated successfully, recurrent hemorrhoidal prolapse (n-5) and were operated with an mm procedure, residual skin tags (n-65), recurrent bleeding (n-19), pain (n-8), and itching (n-10).The present data revealed no significant negative impact of longo¿s technique on anorectal function.In contrast, the incontinence score showed a slight improvement without a statistical significance.According to the evacuation score, the results showed a significant improvement of evacuation.
|