| Catalog Number |
0117170 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Hernia (2240); Injury (2348)
|
| Date of Event |
10/26/2017
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made regarding the bard/davol perfix light plug (device #2) used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided therefore a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard/davol perfix light plug (device #2).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol bard flat mesh (device #1).The patient's attorney did not make any allegations regarding the implanted bard/davol perfix plug device.Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol bard mesh (device #1) or an unspecified perfix light plug (device #2) or an unspecified bard/davol perfix plug on (b)(6) 2013 or (b)(6) 2014.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the bard/davol bard mesh (device #1) and the bard/davol perfix light plug (device #2).It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.As reported, the attorney alleges patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol bard mesh (device #1) or an unspecified perfix light plug (device #2) or an unspecified bard/davol perfix plug on (b)(6) 2013 or (b)(6) 2014.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the bard/davol bard mesh (device #1) and the bard/davol perfix light plug (device #2).It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.As reported, the attorney alleges patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2013 ¿ patient was diagnosed with direct right inguinal hernia thereby underwent open repair with the implant of bard preshaped mesh (device #1).Per op notes, ¿a bard preshaped keyhole mesh (device #1) was placed into defect and secured to the pubic tubercle using sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2014 ¿ patient was diagnosed with indirect left inguinal hernia thereby underwent open repair with the implant of perfix plug (device #2).Per op notes, ¿a large sized perfix plug (device #2) was placed into the defect, sewn into position using sutures.An onlay patch was sewn onto the pubic tubercle, the shelving edge of the inguinal ligament, as well as the transversalis fascia.¿ (b)(6) 2017 ¿ patient was diagnosed with recurrent left and primary right inguinal hernia thereby underwent open repair with the implant of perfix plug (device #3) and bard mesh (device #4).Per op notes, ¿on right, the indirect hernia sac was reduced.A small size perfix plug (device #3) was placed in the area and sewn into position using sutures.An onlay patch was sewn on the pubic tubercle, the shelving edge of the inguinal ligament and transversails fascia using sutures.On left, small medial direct hernia defect was identified.A small piece of bard mesh (device #4) was sewn into position using sutures.¿ (note: the mesh implanted on left side of defect in this procedure was unknown).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made regarding the bard/davol perfix light plug (device #2) used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided therefore a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard/davol perfix light plug (device #2).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol bard flat mesh (device #1).The patient's attorney did not make any allegations regarding the implanted bard/davol perfix plug device.Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-may-2014) is considered to be a best estimate.This supplemental emdr represents the bard/davol perfix light plug (device #2).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol bard flat mesh (device #1).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|