| Catalog Number |
RMT281418 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Aneurysm (1708)
|
| Date of Event |
06/11/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The review of the manufacturing paperwork verified that this lot met all pre-release specifications.Requested further information.The gore® excluder® aaa endoprosthesis instructions for use (ifu) states that adverse events that may occur and/or require intervention include, but are not limited to endoleak and aneurysm enlargement.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6) 2011 the patient had two gore® excluder® aaa endoprostheses implanted to repair an abdominal aortic aneurysm (aaa).On (b)(6) 2016 the patient presented with abdominal and lower back pain after a fall.Imaging showed a type ii endoleak from a lumbar artery and the physician decided to monitor the patient at that time.On an unknown date in 2017, the patient reportedly had surgery to repair the type ii endoleak (devices unknown).Reportedly the endoleak was resolved at this time.On (b)(6) 2019, the patient was admitted to the hospital and the physician decided to look for a suspected endoleak.While inside of the patient and endoleak was not seen, but the ct scan showed some type of leak above the rmt281418 (main body) device.The patient reported that a new aneurysm had grown above the current gore devices implanted.The physician then decided to do a re-intervention and a non-gore device was then implanted above the renal arteries and the endoleak was resolved.The patient reportedly tolerated the procedure.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
B5: updated event description.Images were provided to gore for evaluation and according to the images dated (b)(6)2019, there appears to be a lack of wall apposition at the proximal end of the implanted device.The ima appears to have been previously embolized and there appears to be contrast outside of the previously implanted device on the arterial and delay phases.Also, there appears to be a patent lumbar on the arterial phase and an endoleak of indeterminate origin.According to the gore® excluder® aaa endoprosthesis instructions for use (ifu), adverse events that may occur and/or require intervention include, but are not limited to endoleak.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6), 2011 the patient had two gore® excluder® aaa endoprostheses implanted to repair an abdominal aortic aneurysm (aaa).On (b)(6), 2016 the patient presented with abdominal and lower back pain after a fall.Imaging showed a type ii endoleak from a lumbar artery and the physician decided to monitor the patient at that time.On an unknown date in 2017, the patient reportedly had surgery to repair the type ii endoleak (devices unknown).Reportedly the endoleak was resolved at this time.It was also reported that the patient had coiling of the aneurysm sac and the inferior mesenteric artery (ima) during this procedure.On (b)(6), 2019, the patient was admitted to the hospital and the physician decided to look for a suspected endoleak.While inside of the patient and endoleak was not seen, but the ct scan showed some type of leak above the rmt281418 (main body) device.The patient reported that a new aneurysm had grown above the current gore devices implanted.Reportedly since the physician was unclear of the origin of the leak, he decided to reline the previously implanted gore device with a non-gore (ovation) device.The ovation device was then implanted above the renal arteries and the endoleak was resolved.The patient reportedly tolerated the procedure.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|