| Catalog Number |
5954600 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Material Deformation (2976); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190); Migration (4003)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Adhesion(s) (1695); Hernia (2240); Injury (2348)
|
| Date of Event |
04/19/2016
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges injuries and subsequent surgery; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol ventralight st on (b)(6) 2016.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device(s).As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the bard/davol ventralight st.As reported, the attorney alleges patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges injuries and subsequent surgery; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-sep-2015) is considered to be a best estimate.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol ventralight st on (b)(6) 2016.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device(s).As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the bard/davol ventralight st.As reported, the attorney alleges patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2016 ¿ patient was diagnosed with incarcerated ventral incisional hernia thereby underwent robotic assisted repair with the implant of ventralight st (device #1).Per op notes, ¿a piece of round ventralight st mesh (device #1) was placed intraperitoneally and sutured.¿ (b)(6) 2016 ¿ patient was diagnosed with recurrent incarcerated incisional hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with the implant of ventralight st (device #2).Per op notes, ¿adhesiolysis was done.The upper portion of mesh (device #1) had pulled through and folded over.There was a small portion of the falciform ligament was incarcerated in the defect.A piece of ventralight st mesh (device #2) was in right upper quadrant and overlapped with other piece of mesh (device #1).¿.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|