| Catalog Number |
GLM930040 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Positioning Problem (3009)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
07/02/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint #: (b)(4).Based on the analysis of the preliminary pictures received, the flouro saver marker is too proximal.The findings meet mdr reporting criteria.Based on the photos provided, it can be concluded that what is reported by the client is confirmed because the fluoro-saver marker can be seen out of position and with apparent damage.It can also be seen that the introducer left the re-sheating tool confirming what was reported by the client.Information regarding patient weight, height, medical history, race, and ethnicity was not reported.Procode: krd/hcg.Phone number: (b)(6).Manufacturing site name: codman and shurtleff inc., dba depuy synthes products, inc.(b)(4).A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device l14078 number, and no non-conformances related to the reported complaint condition were identified.The product has been returned for evaluation and testing; however, the engineering evaluation has not been completed.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported by a healthcare professional, during the insertion of a 3mm x 4cm galaxy g3 (glm930040, l14078) into a microcatheter, the physician noticed the issue of the fluoro-saver marker (out of position).Under the judgment of the physician, the coil was implanted without any problems and it was detached.The dpu was removed from the patient¿s body, and the procedure was completed.There was also no patient injury reported.The user did not apply excessive force during unsheathing or re-sheathing of the device.The coil delivery system was prepped without any difficulty.The device was device was stored and handled per the instructions for sue (ifu).No further information is available.Based on the analysis of the preliminary pictures received, the flouro saver marker is too proximal.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint#: (b)(4).Complaint conclusion: as reported by a healthcare professional, during the insertion of a 3mm x 4cm galaxy g3 (glm930040, l14078) into a microcatheter, the physician noticed the issue of the fluoro-saver marker (out of position).Under the judgment of the physician, the coil was implanted without any problems and it was detached.The dpu was removed from the patient¿s body, and the procedure was completed.There was also no patient injury reported.The user did not apply excessive force during unsheathing or re-sheathing of the device.The coil delivery system was prepped without any difficulty.The device was stored and handled per the instructions for use (ifu).No further information is available.A non-sterile unit galaxy g3 mini 3mm x 4cm was received inside of a pouch.The hub was inspected, and no damages was noted on it.The dpu was inspected and it was found kinked at 38 cm, 74 cm and 186 cm.The fluoro-saver markers were found out of position without space between them.The distal fluoro saver marker was found compressed and cracked at 38.3 cm from hub, and it was found without specification according to the document (b)(4) rev.9.However, a microscopic inspection was performed and evidence of the proper previous fluoro saver marker position was observed.The re-sheathing tool was inspected, and it was found in good normal conditions.The introducer was inspected, and it was found unzipped outside of the re-sheating tool.The v-notch was inspected under microscope and it was found in normal good condition.The rh was inspected under microscope and it was found heated, also the rh coil was found with and stretched/compress condition.The articulation joint and the embolic coil were not returned for evaluation.The functional analysis could not be performed due the introducer was found outside the re-sheating tool.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device l14078 number, and no non-conformances related to the reported complaint condition were identified.The complaint reported by the customer ¿coil introducer - damaged-during prep¿ was confirmed, during the visual inspection the introducer was found outside of the re-sheating tool.The complaint reported by the customer ¿device positioning unit (thermo-mechanical detachment system) - fluoro saver markers - out of position¿ was confirmed, during the visual inspection all the fluoro saver marker was found out of position.The kinked condition noted on the dpu and the stretched condition on the rh coil may have contributed to the failure and appear to have been caused by excessive force and handling being applied to the device however none of those can be conclusively determined.The compressed and cracked condition observed on the distal fluoro saver marker is related to the failure reported by the costumer and they could have appeared by excessive force and handling being applied to the device however none of those can be conclusively determined.Neither the analysis nor the mre suggest that the failures reported by the costumer could be related to the manufacturing process.Based on the information available and evidence presented by the returned device, it is possible that procedural and handling factors may have contributed to the reported failures.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended to identify statistical signals for consideration of further correction action.Since there was no evidence to suggest the events were related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint#: (b)(4).Complaint conclusion updated: as reported by a healthcare professional, during the insertion of a 3mm x 4cm galaxy g3 (glm930040, l14078) into a microcatheter, the physician noticed the issue of the fluoro-saver marker (out of position).Under the judgment of the physician, the coil was implanted without any problems and it was detached.The dpu was removed from the patient¿s body, and the procedure was completed.There was also no patient injury reported.The user did not apply excessive force during unsheathing or re-sheathing of the device.The coil delivery system was prepped without any difficulty.The device was stored and handled per the instructions for use (ifu).No further information is available.A non-sterile unit galaxy g3 mini 3mm x 4cm was received inside of a pouch.The hub was inspected, and no damages was noted on it.The dpu was inspected and it was found kinked at 38 cm, 74 cm and 186 cm.The fluoro-saver markers were found out of position without space between them.The distal fluoro saver marker was found compressed and cracked at 38.3 cm from hub, and it was found without specification.However, a microscopic inspection was performed, and evidence of the proper previous fluoro saver marker position was observed.The specification of the length of one marker is 5 +/- 1 mm per 103045616 rev:4.The marker band #5 was found without specification.All the gaps are out of specification, the specification for the gap length is 4 ¿ 6 mm.The re-sheathing tool was inspected, and it was found in good normal conditions.The introducer was inspected, and it was found unzipped outside of the re-sheating tool.The v-notch was inspected under microscope and it was found in normal good condition.The rh was inspected under microscope and it was found heated, also the rh coil was found with and stretched/compress condition.The articulation joint and the embolic coil were not returned for evaluation.The functional analysis could not be performed due the introducer was found outside the re-sheating tool.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device l14078 number, and no non-conformances related to the reported complaint condition were identified.Based on the preliminary photos received, it t can be concluded that what is reported by the client is confirmed because the fluoro-saver marker can be seen out of position and with apparent damage.It can also be seen that the introducer left the re-sheating tool confirming what was reported by the customer.The complaint reported by the customer ¿coil introducer - damaged-during prep¿ was confirmed, during the visual inspection the introducer was found outside of the re-sheating tool.The complaint reported by the customer ¿device positioning unit (thermo-mechanical detachment system) - fluoro saver markers - out of position¿ was confirmed, during the visual inspection all the fluoro saver marker was found out of position.The kinked condition noted on the dpu and the stretched condition on the rh coil may have contributed to the failure and appear to have been caused by excessive force and handling being applied to the device however none of those can be conclusively determined.The compressed and cracked condition observed on the distal fluoro saver marker is related to the failure reported by the costumer and they could have appeared by excessive force and handling being applied to the device however none of those can be conclusively determined.Based on the information available, it is possible that clinical and procedural factors, including device manipulation / interaction, aneurysm size and vessel characteristics, device selection, and the concomitant microcatheter, may have contributed to the reported issues.An internal corrective action was opened to address this issue.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|