| Model Number |
BXAL083902A |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Positioning Failure (1158)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
| Date of Event |
07/23/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6) 2019 a patient was undergoing treatment of bilateral iliac lesions with a gore® viabahn® vbx balloon expandable endoprostheses.The first device was advanced through a 7fr cordis brite tip short sheath (13cm).The vbx was attempted to be advanced beyond the short sheath, but it could not cross the lesion due to tight anatomy.The device was removed through the short sheath and placed on the back table.Then the lesion was ballooned.This device was attempted to be reinserted, but the stent came off the balloon catheter.The stent was partially stuck in the introducer sheath.As the device and sheath were being removed the exposed part of the stent was stuck in the subcutaneous tissue of the access site.This resulted in a cutdown procedure to remove the stent from the subcutaneous tissue.Another vbx device was being prepped for use, however when the device was being flushed, fluid came out of the balloon inflation port, causing the device to deploy.The physician did not observe how the technician was preporing the device for use so it cannot be confirmed that the correct port was utilized.This device was not used.The sheath was upsized to a longer 8fr sheath and two 7mm x 20mm vbx devices were advanced and deployed successfully.A third vbx device was advanced and deployed successfully in the desired location.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H.6.Results code 2: 213 the engineering evaluation stated the following: two gore viabahn bx endoprosthesis were returned for engineering evaluation.One of the returned devices is the deployed delivery system of a gore viabahn bx endoprosthesis.This deployed delivery system is covered in biological material indicating it is the third device described in the event description.The third device in the event description ¿was advanced and deployed successfully in the desired location¿.Therefore this device was not evaluated.The second returned device is the dislodged viabahn bx endoprosthesis and the un-deployed delivery system.This endoprosthesis was received on a non-gore balloon catheter inserted into a non-gore introducer sheath.The un-deployed gore viabahn delivery system is separate from the device.The un-deployed balloon catheter as well as the dislodged endoprosthesis confirmed the device size of 8l x 39 x 1350 mm device.The event description describes the removal and attempted reuse of the gore viabahn bx device: ¿the first device was advanced through a 7fr cordis brite tip short sheath (13cm).The vbx was attempted to be advanced beyond the short sheath, but it could not cross the lesion due to tight anatomy.The device was removed through the short sheath and placed on the back table.Then the lesion was ballooned.This device was attempted to be reinserted, but the stent came off the balloon catheter.¿ the viabahn bx ifu warning section states: ¿after removal, do not reuse the gore® viabahn® vbx balloon expandable endoprosthesis or introducer sheath.¿ the second returned device should have been discarded per the ifu.Engineering evaluation conclusion(s): the endoprosthesis that dislodged should have been discarded per the ifu.Based on the device examinations performed, no manufacturing anomalies were identified to which the event could be definitively attributed.H.6.Conclusion code 1 updated.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H.6.Conclusion code 1: updated.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H.6.Results code2: 213 updated: h.6.Conclusion code 1: 4315 updated: the dislodged viabahn bx endoprosthesis and the un-deployed delivery system was returned.This endoprosthesis was received on a boston scientific mustang ¿ balloon catheter inserted into a cordis brite tip® 7 fr short sheath.The un-deployed gore viabahn delivery system was returned separate from the endoprosthesis.The un-deployed balloon catheter as well as the dislodged endoprosthesis confirmed the device size of 8l x 39 x 1350 mm.Gore did not receive the second device described in the event as such, "when the device was being flushed, fluid came out of the balloon inflation port, causing the device to deploy." and, therefore, a physical examination of the device was not performed.Additionally, the deployed delivery system of a gore viabahn bx endoprosthesis was returned.This deployed delivery system, did not have an endoprosthesis attached or sent back, and appeared to have been fully inflated indicating it is the third device described in the event description.The third device in the event description ¿was advanced and deployed successfully in the desired location¿.Therefore, this device was not evaluated because there was no allegation against this device.Stent dislodgement of the vbx device may be affected by device profile and manufacturing crush force.Device profile is 100% verified during the vbx manufacturing process.The device history file was reviewed and no anomalies were identified.Crush force is controlled through machine maintenance and calibration.Machine history files were reviewed and no non-routine maintenance was identified.Based on the device evaluation performed, no manufacturing anomalies were identified to which the event could be definitively attributed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|