• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION STERLING; CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION STERLING; CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS Back to Search Results
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 07/03/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(6).Age at time of event: (b)(6).
 
Event Description
It was reported that the balloon could not cross the lesion an the shaft broke.A 5x40mm sterling balloon and a 2.1 jetstream xc catheter were selected for use during a j-supreme ii study.The target lesion, located in the left distal superficial femoral artery (sfa) extending into the proximal popliteal artery, was 99% stenosed, had a reference vessel diameter of 6.0 mm, length of 130 mm and was classified as a tasc ii b lesion.The target lesion was treated with balloon angioplasty followed by debulking using the jetstream device, resulting in 50% residual stenosis.Post treatment, percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (pta) was performed, with 25% final residual stenosis.During the procedure, ivus was passed through the middle of the popliteal artery, but a calcified nodule protruding into the intravascular lumen was observed.The sterling balloon could not pass through the lesion and the shaft broke making it unusable.The guidewire was changed to a thruway, and then atherectomy was performed a total of three times using the jetstream study device.Subsequent contrast images showed markedly slow flow and distal emboli of left anterior tibial artery, posterior tibial artery and peroneal artery of target limb was noted.Suction was first performed and the debris was successfully suctioned; flow improved.The original lesion was excavated using jetstream, and after pre-dilatation with a non-bsc balloon, drug application was performed using a non-bsc balloon.As it was concerned that the anterior tibial artery flow was poor in the final enhanced imaging, the wire cross was performed again to the anterior tibial artery.There was embolization of debris in the distal part of the anterior tibial artery, and suction catheter and non-bsc balloon could not pass through the same area.Since the non-bsc balloon could not pass through the lesion either, the back-up was enhanced using guidezilla, and then it was successfully passed.Dilatation was performed in the same area.With this dilatation, blood flow improved.The procedure was completed.The sheath was removed and hemostasis was performed using a non-bsc device.The event was considered recovered/resolved.The subject was discharged on aspirin and clopidogrel on (b)(6) 2019.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
STERLING
Type of Device
CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
two scimed place
maple grove MN 55311
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC
maple grove MN
Manufacturer Contact
jay johnson
two scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634942574
MDR Report Key8883945
MDR Text Key154000064
Report Number2134265-2019-09529
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LIT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 08/12/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/12/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/30/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-