|
COOK IRELAND LTD ZILVER PTX 35 DRUG-ELUTING STENT; NIU STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG-ELUTING
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
G24888 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
05/11/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Pma/510(k) #: p100022.Investigation is still pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
(b)(6), study pt, occlusion/restenosis within & proximal to study lesion possibly related to study product.One zilver® ptx® v study stent was placed during the index procedure on (b)(6) 2015.The study lesion was the left distal sfa, 20 mm in length, with 75% diameter stenosis.There were two patent runoff vessels.The patient underwent pre-dilatation of study lesion with one inflation of a 5.0 x 40 mm balloon at 12 atm for 60 seconds.One zilver® ptx® v study stent was placed in the left distal superficial femoral artery via contralateral access.Post-stent dilatation was performed with three inflations of a 5.0 mm x 20 mm dilatation balloon at 20 atm for 20 seconds, 30 seconds, and 30 seconds.At the end of the case, there was 20% residual stenosis remaining in the study lesion, no thrombus was present.On the same day, the patient was discharged from the hospital taking aspirin and plavix.On (b)(6) 2016 (281 days post-procedure), the patient experienced an occlusion/restenosis of the study lesion requiring intervention as previously reported.On (b)(6) 2017 (604 days post-procedure), the patient experienced an occlusion/restenosis of the study lesion requiring intervention as previously reported.On (b)(6) 2018 (1185 days post-procedure), the patient complained of left lower extremity claudication, worsened claudication/rest pain.On (b)(6) 2018 (1197 days post-procedure), the patient underwent a secondary intervention as previously reported.On (b)(6) 2019 (1438 days post-procedure), the patient was diagnosed with an occlusion/restenosis within and proximal to the study lesion.The physician indicated was ¿possibly¿ related to the study product.The pre-existing condition of peripheral arterial disease (pad) caused or contributed to the event.The patient continued taking aspirin and plavix the secondary intervention was performed on (b)(6) 2019 (1478 days post-procedure).The pre-intervention diameter stenosis was occluded.The treatment provided was percutaneous, including atherectomy, use of a cutting balloon.The secondary intervention was deemed successful with residual stenosis <50%.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Pma/510(k) #: p100022.This report is being submitted as a cancellation report based on additional information received.Additional information indicates that a supera stent was placed over the zilver stent prior to this event.This "effectively removed the zilver stent from circulation" therefore this event is not related to the device.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
This report is being submitted as a cancellation report based on additional information received.Additional information indicates that a supera stent was placed over the zilver stent prior to this event.This "effectively removed the zilver stent from circulation" therefore this event is not related to the device.12-004, study pt, occlusion/restenosis within & proximal to study lesion possibly related to study product.One zilver® ptx® v study stent was placed during the index procedure on (b)(6) 2015.The study lesion was the left distal sfa, 20 mm in length, with 75% diameter stenosis.There were two patent runoff vessels.The patient underwent pre-dilatation of study lesion with one inflation of a 5.0 x 40 mm balloon at 12 atm for 60 seconds.One zilver® ptx® v study stent was placed in the left distal superficial femoral artery via contralateral access.Post-stent dilatation was performed with three inflations of a 5.0 mm x 20 mm dilatation balloon at 20 atm for 20 seconds, 30 seconds, and 30 seconds.At the end of the case, there was 20% residual stenosis remaining in the study lesion, no thrombus was present.On the same day, the patient was discharged from the hospital taking aspirin and plavix.On (b)(6) 2016 (281 days post-procedure), the patient experienced an occlusion/restenosis of the study lesion requiring intervention as previously reported.On (b)(6) 2017 (604 days post-procedure), the patient experienced an occlusion/restenosis of the study lesion requiring intervention as previously reported.On (b)(6) 2018 (1185 days post-procedure), the patient complained of left lower extremity claudication, worsened claudication/rest pain.On (b)(6) 2018 (1197 days post-procedure), the patient underwent a secondary intervention as previously reported.On (b)(6) 2019 (1438 days post-procedure), the patient was diagnosed with an occlusion/restenosis within and proximal to the study lesion.The physician indicated was ¿possibly¿ related to the study product.The pre-existing condition of peripheral arterial disease (pad) caused or contributed to the event.The patient continued taking aspirin and plavix.The secondary intervention was performed on (b)(6) 2019 (1478 days post-procedure).The pre-intervention diameter stenosis was occluded.The treatment provided was percutaneous, including atherectomy, use of a cutting balloon.The secondary intervention was deemed successful with residual stenosis <50%.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|