| Catalog Number |
143110 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Break (1069); Non Reproducible Results (4029)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Bone Fracture(s) (1870)
|
| Date of Event |
03/01/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
As part of normal complaint follow-up, an evaluation of the event has been initiated by mako surgical.A supplemental report will be submitted when additional information becomes available.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Dr.(b)(6) had a patient receive a stress fracture at the tibial pin site six months ago and is still recovering from it.Case type: tka.Additional information from mps: here is all the information i received yesterday regarding the stress fracture complaint: -patient is 6 month post op, -has stress fracture at tibial pin site -patient is still healing.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
(b)(6) had a patient receive a stress fracture at the tibial pin site six months ago and is still recovering from it.Case type: tka.Additional information from mps: here is all the information i received yesterday regarding the stress fracture complaint: patient is 6 month.Post op, has stress fracture at tibial pin site.Patient is still healing.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Follow-up #1 and final report submitted to update sections d.3, g.1, g.4, g.7, h.2, h.3, h.6, h.10 and h.11 based on the results of investigation.Reported event: dr.(b)(6) had a patient receive a stress fracture at the tibial pin site six months ago and is still recovering from it.Case type: tka.Additional information from mps: here is all the information i received yesterday regarding the stress fracture complaint: patient is 6 month post op.Has stress fracture at tibial pin site.Patient is still healing.Product evaluation and results: product inspection was not performed as product was not returned for inspection.Product history review: product history review was not conducted as lot number is not provided.Complaint history review: complaint history review was not conducted as lot number is not provided.Conclusions: the failure mode could not be confirmed because the part was not available for evaluation.If device and/or additional information become available, this investigation will be reopened.Corrective action/preventive action: a review of stryker¿s nc/capa database indicated there have been no nc and capa associated with the product and failure mode reported in this event.H3 other text : product was not available for evaluation.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|