|
|
| Catalog Number |
0112670 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Adhesion(s) (1695); Pain (1994); Hernia (2240); Injury (2348); Disability (2371); Obstruction/Occlusion (2422)
|
| Date of Event |
02/20/2009
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made to what extent the bard/davol flat mesh(device #1) may have caused or contributed to the reported event.The cause of the patient postoperative complications cannot be determined at this time.No lot number has been provided therefore a review of the manufacturing records is not possible at this time.Information is limited.Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.This emdr represents the bard/davol flat mesh (device #1).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol flat mesh (device #2).Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol bard mesh (device #1 and device #2) on (b)(6) 2007 and (b)(6) 2008.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the two (2) bard mesh(device #1 and device #2).As reported, the attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient.".
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made to what extent the bard/davol flat mesh (device #1) may have caused or contributed to the reported event.The cause of the patient postoperative complications cannot be determined at this time.No lot number has been provided therefore a review of the manufacturing records is not possible at this time.Information is limited.Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.This emdr represents the bard/davol flat mesh (device #1).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol flat mesh (device #2).Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Based on the additional information received, there is no change to initial determination, no conclusions can be made.Per medical records review, about 2 post implant of bard flat mesh, patient was diagnosed with hernia recurrence, adhesions and obstruction thereby underwent repair with removal of mesh.The instructions-for-use supplied with the device lists hernia recurrence and adhesions as possible complications.This supplemental emdr represents the bard flat mesh (device #1).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the bard flat mesh (device #2).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol bard mesh (device #1 and device #2) on (b)(6)2007 and (b)(6)2008.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the two (2) bard mesh (device #1 and device #2).As reported, the attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6)2007 - patient was diagnosed with painful scar, protuberance and hernia in epigastric region thereby underwent repair with implant of bard mesh (device #1).Per operative notes, ¿a small epigastric hernia was repaired with bard mesh (device #1) and sutured in place.¿ (b)(6)2007 - patient had small bowel obstruction thereby underwent repair.Per operative notes, ¿the site of obstruction found in left mid abdomen.The adhesions were lysed and dense scar encountered.Many small defects in abdominal wall incorporated into a closure.¿ (note, no mesh was visualized during this repair).(b)(6)2008 - patient had abdominal wall hernia thereby underwent repair with bard mesh (device #2).Per operative notes, ¿the hernia sac was dissected away from defect.In the anterior abdominal wall, there was bilobed hernia defect.A piece of bard mesh (device #2) used to cover both defects and helical tacked to the wall.The mesh was cut to appropriate size then sutured in placed.¿ (note, the mesh (device #1) was not visualized during this repair).(b)(6)2008 - patient had laxity of mesh abdominal wall incisional hernia thereby underwent repair.Per operative notes, ¿noted a protuberance of left lower repair of hernia repair consisted with a separation of mesh (device #2) from fascia.The mesh was tightened by placing additional sutures.¿ (b)(6)2008 - patient had recurrent abdominal hernia thereby underwent repair.Per operative notes, ¿the hernia defect was noted to be due to prior placed mesh (device #2) separating from right lateral aspect of abdominal wound which was adherent on opposite side.Sutures were used to reattach the mesh circumferentially.¿ (b)(6)2009 - patient had recurrent incisional hernia thereby underwent lap converted to open repair with mesh and removal of old mesh.Per operative notes, ¿small bowel dense adhesions to the mesh were lysed.Excised all mesh (device #1 & #2) completely.There was some omentum that adherent to bowel causing an internal hernia.A synthetic (vicryl) mesh was used to repair the defect and sutured in place.¿ attorney alleges that the patient had adhesions, bowel obstruction, bowel perforation, mesh migration, pain and hernia recurrence.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|