This incident is being reported due to the allegation that the patient was sent to a burn center for his injury.At this time, there is not enough information to suggest that the concentrator contributed to the patient's death.The severity of the injury and specific treatment received is unknown.Details of the patient's death (date, cause, etc.) are also unknown.This information has been requested but not provided.There was no alleged malfunction/deficiency with the device.Based on the available information, the event was a result of use error; the patient did not adhere to the device labeling and instructions.The irc5po2v user manual states, "do not smoke while using this device.Do not use near open flame or ignition sources.No smoking signs should be prominently displayed.Keep all matches, lighted cigarettes, electronic cigarettes or other sources of ignition out of the room in which this concentrator is located and away from where oxygen is being delivered." in addition, the device itself is prominently labeled regarding the hazard of smoking or exposing the unit to an open flame/ignition source.Should additional information become available, a supplemental record will be filed.
|
Invacare attended a conference call with the provider.Invacare again requested details regarding the patient's injury and death.The provider advised that the only information they were given was that the patient had severe burns to his face and esophagus.The patient's medical records were requested.The provider advised that none were available.Any medical treatment that the patient may have received is still unknown.The provider was also asked for a copy of the patient's death certificate or cause of death.The provider advised that they had requested this information, but it was not provided to them.The patient's cause of death remains unknown.The provider was asked to return the concentrator to invacare for inspection.They stated that, per their policy, they are keeping the unit in quarantine and will not return it to invacare.The provider did send a copy of the equipment check that they had performed on (b)(6) 2019, which shows that the concentrator was operating properly at that time.This additional information supports the initial findings that the concentrator contributed to a serious injury but that the incident was a result of use error and not a device deficiency.
|