| Model Number |
04.005.566S |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Code Available (3191)
|
| Date of Event |
01/01/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Reporter is a legal professional.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.(b)(4).Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2018, the patient sustained unknown injuries from synthes implants.Patient was originally implanted with a femoral recon nail (frn) and screws on (b)(6) 2018.This report is for a 5.0mm titanium (ti) locking screw 76mm.This is report 4 of 4 for (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.The received document with x-rays was reviewed.From page 37 till 42 is a broken nail visible, the nail broke at an unoccupied distal locking hole therefore is the complaint rated as unconfirmed for the locking screws.Product was not returned, therefore no further investigation is possible.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Pma/510k: awareness date reported on follow up 2 report as july 23, 2019 but should have been november 22, 2019.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported on or about (b)(6) 2018, the patient suffered a fractured right femur due to a vehicle accident.On (b)(6) 2018, a synthes intramedullary rod was implanted to the patient.On or about (b)(6) 2018, x-rays revealed a clear result but the patient was still suffering from a slight limp without pain.On or about (b)(6) 2018, the patient had sustained injuries from synthes products being defective.He felt a pop and pain in his leg.X-rays revealed a fracture of intramedullary pin fixating a fracture of the distal 3rd of the femoral diaphysis with mild apex anterior angulation.On or about (b)(6) 2019, after three months of therapy, the patient was released to return to work but still suffering from limping and now has pain in both hip and knee which he did not have prior to the rod failure.This complaint involves four (4) devices.This is 4 of 4 for report (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Only pictures of device sent back, no physical device received for investigation.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6) 2018 the patient underwent an unknown procedure to remove a broken rod with subsequent replacement of a new larger rod.On or about (b)(6) 2018, the patient suffered a fractured right femur due to a vehicle accident.On (b)(6) 2018, a synthes intramedullary rod was implanted to the patient.On or about (b)(6) 2018, x-rays revealed a clear result but the patient was still suffering from a slight limp without pain.On or about (b)(6) 2018, the patient had sustained injuries from synthes products being defective.He felt a pop and pain in his leg.X-rays revealed a fracture of intramedullary pin fixating a fracture of the distal 3rd of the femoral diaphysis with mild apex anterior angulation.On or about (b)(6) 2019, after three months of therapy, the patient was released to return to work but still suffering from limping and now has pain in both hip and knee which he did not have prior to the rod failure.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.H10 additional narrative: device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.A1-a4 updated; patient height reported as 5'7 ft.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Updated event description on (b)(6)2018, the patient underwent a removal of deep, broken nail which is complex hardware removal, intramedullary nailing of the right femur fracture using retrograde nailing and bone grafting of a delayed union of the right femur using reamer hardware, irrigation and aspiration technique due to failed right femur fracture internal fixation broken nail to remove a broken rod with subsequent replacement of a new larger rod.On or about (b)(6) 2018, the patient suffered a fractured right femur due to a vehicle accident.On (b)(6) 2018, the patient underwent a right femur shaft intramedullary nail fixation and removal of skeletal traction where a synthes intramedullary rod was implanted to the patient.On or about (b)(6) 2018, x-rays revealed a clear result but the patient was still suffering from a slight limp without pain.On or about (b)(6) 2018, the patient had sustained injuries from synthes products being defective.He felt a pop and pain in his leg.X-rays revealed a fracture of intramedullary pin fixating a fracture of the distal 3rd of the femoral diaphysis with mild apex anterior angulation.On or about (b)(6) 2019, after three months of therapy, the patient was released to return to work but still suffering from limping and now has pain in both hip and knee which he did not have prior to the rod failure.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Updated medical record, tests/lab data.Updated contact info.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|