| Model Number |
9010 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Reocclusion (1985)
|
| Date of Event |
06/28/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturing review: the sample was not returned from the user facility; therefore, a device evaluation is unable to be performed.A lot history review revealed one reocclusion complaint was associated with this lot.A review of the device history record (dhr) indicates the lot was manufactured to specification.Investigation summary: the actual sample was not returned for evaluation.It is known that the patient¿s target lesion was reportedly reoccluded.A revascularization was performed and the hcp deemed it was successful.The investigator assessed that the event was possibly related to the study device, but not related to the procedure.The root cause could not be determined based upon the available information received from the post market clinical registry.Label review: based on the instructions for use (ifu), the occurrence of reocclusion is an inherent risk of any pta procedure, and has been reported in clinical trials of drug coated balloons.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through a (b)(6) study during the index procedure, a lutonix percutaneous transluminal drug coated balloon (dcb) dilatation catheter was used to treat the target lesion in the left upper arm brachial cephalic.Approximately 133 days post index procedure, the target lesion was reoccluded.Re-intervention was performed with successful result.The investigator assessed the reocclusion event was possibly related to the study device and not related to the index procedure.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through a post market approval study during the index procedure, a lutonix percutaneous transluminal drug coated balloon (dcb) dilatation catheter was used to treat the target lesion in the left upper arm brachial cephalic.Approximately 133 days post index procedure, the target lesion was reoccluded.Re-intervention was performed with successful result.It was further reported that, approximately 11 months post index procedure, the target lesion was reoccluded.Re-intervention was performed with successful result.The investigator assessed the reocclusion events were not related to the study device or the index procedure.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: a dhr review was conducted and there was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: inconclusive.The sample was not returned by the facility for further evaluation.Past medical history includes the following: former smoker, dyslipidemia, hypertension, abdominal aortic aneurysm, colon cancer, anemia, and esrd.It was reported within 133 days after the index procedure, the patient¿s target lesion was reportedly reoccluded.A revascularization was performed and the hcp deemed it was successful.The investigator assessed that the event was not related to the study device and not related to the procedure.No adverse patient outcomes were reported.Label review: based on the instructions for use (ifu), the occurrence of reocclusion is an inherent risk of any pta procedure, and has been reported in clinical trials of drug coated balloons.H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|