|
|
| Model Number |
TEXP120RH |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Rupture (1546)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Code Available (3191)
|
| Date of Event |
11/22/2016
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Upon receipt by mentor, the device contained no fluid and could not be weighed.No foreign material was observed within the device or on the shell surface.Evaluation of the device revealed a rent measuring approximately 1.9 cm near the inferior edge of the anterior aspect.Microscopic examination of the edges of the rent gave no indications as to cause.No other anomalies were discovered.The complaint was confirmed.Mentor performs 100% inspection and testing of all devices prior to release, product evaluation concluded that the rent occurred sometime subsequent to the removal of the device from its protective packaging.Potential cause: a possible cause of the failure could not be determined.The severity level for this complaint code was determined to be a s3, which is defined as: necessitates intrusive medical or surgical intervention.Conclusion statement: according to the information provided, the patient experienced a deflation on the implant.Evaluation of the device revealed a rent measuring approximately 1.9 cm near the inferior edge of the anterior aspect.Microscopic examination of the edges of the rent gave no indications as to cause.No other anomalies were discovered.The complaint was confirmed.Mentor performs 100% inspection and testing of all devices prior to release, product evaluation concluded that the rent occurred sometime subsequent to the removal of the device from its protective packaging.Breast implants are not considered lifetime devices and deflation is a known complication associated with these devices and is referenced in our product insert data sheet.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).This report contains supplemental information for mentor asr reference number (b)(4).This device report is being submitted late as a result of the exemption transition period following the revocation of mentor¿s asr exemption #e1999017.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a (b)(6) female patient who underwent an unspecified breast prosthesis implantation procedure with a 375cc artoura breast tissue expander on (b)(6) 2016, had to go undergo explantation just ten minutes after implantation due to the device being deflated.As a result, another unspecified device was implanted in return.This report contains supplemental information for mentor asr reference number (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On (b)(6) 2020, the product investigation was updated: a manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed for the complaint device.The manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was reviewed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Upon visual evaluation, two devices were received.On device a, a delamination was observed on the suture tabs of the posterior aspect and in the palpation ring.By the other hand, device b presented a 8.0 cm delamination at posterior patch and also delamination of the palpation ring.Causes of deflation of saline implants include but are not limited to the following events: crease fold failure, intraoperative or postoperative trauma, excessive stresses or manipulations as may occur during normal, daily routines including customary and purposeful trauma such as that which can occur during vigorous exercise, athletics, etc.As part of our quality process, the manufacturing records of this lot-serial number were reviewed and the manufacturing standards were met prior to the release of this lot.Each device is visually inspected during manufacturing to ensure the device meets the required specifications prior to shipment.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|