|
Site reported there was a difficult lesion in the left main coronary artery, and significantly angled lad.Physician attempted access to the lad with multiple catheters and then attempted with venture but was unsuccessful.Site reported in trying difficult navigation venture may have hooked or penetrated a vessel layer and caused a dissection, unsure from imaging if it was a true dissection.The patient was sent to emergent cabg and expired 2 days after emergent cabg.User identified unfamiliarity with the catheter as contributory cause.Per medwatch uf/importer report # (b)(4) submitted on 05aug19 to fda from site: (b)(6) yo male admitted on (b)(6) with nstemi, underwent cardiac cath (b)(6) showing total occlusion of rca and 70% occlusion of lad.Pt and family decided to pursue pci versus cabg.On (b)(6) pt underwent 2nd cath for stent deployment.Attempt to wire the lad was unsuccessful, resulting in attempt to access the vessel using the venture catheter.At this time the patient decompensated, and it was determined that the lad was dissecting.Pt required pressures and brief cpr.He was taken emergently to the operating room for a salvage cabg.Also, concern for a development of a thrombus.Post op ef was 10%.Pt admitted to sicu in cardiogenic shock and expired on (b)(6).User identified his unfamiliarity with the catheter, specifically in careful manipulation of the curved tip of the catheter in the coronary arteries, as a contributing cause of the patient's decompensation.100% occluded rca, 50% occluded lm, & 70% occluded lad.Two venture catheters were reported used in the procedure, it is unknown which is associated with the event.Second mdr 2134812-2019-00060 submission is associated to this mdr.
|