|
Device evaluation summary: the service engineer (se) evaluated the device and replaced the inspiratory flow module (ifm) printed circuit board (pcb).The ventilator passed all testing per manufacturing specification and was placed back into clinical use.If the replaced part is returned for failure investigation, a supplement medwatch report with the findings will be submitted once the investigation is complete.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
It was reported that, while in use on a patient, a 980 ventilator went into an inoperative condition and generated a background error code.Although requested, information pertaining to patient intervention and outcome has not been provided.
|
|
Device evaluation summary: one of the inspiratory flow module (ifm) printed circuit board (pcb) was returned to medtronic for further analysis.A visual inspection of the returned pcb was conducted and no anomalies were found.The pcb was attached to the failure investigation test ventilator and failed the circuit pressure test, reporting that the inspiratory auto zero solenoid was not operational while generating an alert code related to the ¿inspiratory auto zero solenoid not operational¿.On further investigation ,the cause was isolated to faulty inspiratory pressure transducer, reference designator p1.The cause of the observed condition was determined to be faulty inspiratory pressure transducer(p1) on ifm pcb.The event will be included in trending and monitoring.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|