BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS ACCUCATH, INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER 20 GX1.25; CATHETER,INTRAVASCULAR,THERAPEUTIC,SHORT-TERM LESS THAN 30 DAYS
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number N/A |
Device Problem
Defective Device (2588)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The manufacturer has received the sample and will evaluate.Results are expected soon.A lot history review (lhr) of recz2892 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the placer checked the accucath wire prior to deployment by pushing it out and fully retracting it back in the needle tip.It was stated that the placer stuck the patient, deployed the guidewire and catheter with no issues or resistance noted.While attempting to safety the device, the accucath would not fully safety.The entire device and catheter were removed together.No patient injury.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the placer checked the accucath wire prior to deployment by pushing it out and fully retracting it back in the needle tip.It was stated that the placer stuck the patient, deployed the guidewire and catheter with no issues or resistance noted.While attempting to safety the device, the accucath would not fully safety.The entire device and catheter were removed together.No patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, trend analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), and applicable fmea documents.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of resistance during the device insertion procedure was confirmed and the cause appeared to be use-related.The product returned for evaluation was one 20ga x 1.25¿ accucath peripheral iv catheter assembly.Usage residues were observed throughout the sample.The sample was received with the safety mechanism depressed.The needle was fully withdrawn into the housing.The catheter overlaid the guidewire.Several kinks were observed along the length of the catheter.Microscopic inspection of the catheter confirmed several kinks along its length.The catheter tip exhibited deformation.Following removal of the catheter, inspection of the guidewire revealed misalignment of the coils.Microscopic inspection of the wire revealed a kink in the coiled region, resulting in coil misalignment.The wire was intact.The guidewire and catheter deformation were consistent with attempted insertion against resistance, such as into tissue or at a too-steep insertion angle.It appeared that the wire was deformed and became caught within the catheter during attempted retraction.Such interference can prevent proper retraction of the needle upon depression of the safety button.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|