|
The product, intended for use in treatment, was not returned for evaluation.Per reporter, device was disposed of at the healthcare facility.As such, visual inspection and functional testing could not be performed a relationship, if any, between the subject device and the reported event could not be determined.Thus, the complaint could not be verified, nor could a root cause be determined with confidence.If additional information is received at a future date, this evaluation will be reopened.Potential factors unrelated to the manufacturing or design of the device which could have contributed to the reported event includes: rate of ablation , power settings, and/or prolonged use against dense or bony surfaces.There are no indications to suggest the device did not meet product specifications upon release into distribution.Per our clinical assessment: based on the information provided, the root cause of the broken tip cannot be definitively concluded; however, the ifu does address detachment in the precautions.The instrument is only intended as an externally communicating device; therefore, future patient impact such as local site irritation/corrosion and/or micro-motion of a possibly retained fb could not be ruled out.No patient impact/harm was reported due to the 30-60 minute surgical extension; however, the current patient¿s status remains unknown.No further medical assessment can be rendered at this time.
|