| Model Number |
214622 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Patient Involvement (2645)
|
| Date of Event |
08/05/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device was received, the investigation is in progress, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.A review of the device history record has been requested.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Device report from synthes mitek reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: arthroscopic stabilisation / latarjet procedure; damaged instrument, from consignment instability tray.During the procedure, whilst mobilising tissue around the patient's glenoid, the shaft of the liberator broke off the handle.The separation of the 2 pieces occurred outside of the patient's body, so no fragments (no fragments actually produced, as break was clean) were able to enter the wound.Action taken: source alternate instrument from 2nd tray.3 minute delay to the procedure.No ae to patient.Patient outcome post surgery: stable shoulder joint.This report is 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.A review of the device history record has been requested.The device was received, the investigation is in progress, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.The device was received for evaluation.Visual inspection confirms that the shaft is broken away from the handle.The set screw has retained the proximal end of the shaft inside of the handle.The shaft and the handle are well worn but in as expected condition.This complaint can be confirmed.The probable root cause of this complaint is the age of the device and that an excessive lateral force was applied to the shaft causing it to break.The device is over five years old.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed on (b)(6) 2019 for the finished device 14a01 number, and no non-conformances were identified.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.Udi: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|