• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: JOHNSON & JOHNSON SURGICAL VISION, INC. TECNIS; MONOFOCAL IOLS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

JOHNSON & JOHNSON SURGICAL VISION, INC. TECNIS; MONOFOCAL IOLS Back to Search Results
Model Number ZA9003
Medical Device Problem Code Positioning Failure (1158)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Vitrectomy (2643); No Code Available (3191)
Date of Event 08/07/2019
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Age/date of birth: unknown.Sex/gender: unknown.If implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced during the same procedure.If explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced during the same procedure.(b)(4).An attempt has been made to obtain missing information; however, no definitive response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the intraocular lens (iol) was implanted and removed during same-day procedure as the lens would not hold in the patient's sulcus.There was no replacement lens at that time.The patient required an incision enlargement, sutures, and a vitrectomy.No additional information was provided to johnson & johnson surgical vision.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional info: further information was provided and reported there was no replacement lens.The following sections have been updated accordingly: age/date of birth: (b)(6).Sex/gender: male.(b)(6), health professional, occupation: physician.Additional info: device available for evaluation; returned to manufacturer on: 9/4/2019.Device evaluation: lubricant material residues can be observed on the lens surface.The lens was cut into pieces, which could be related to the removal process.Therefore, the reported issue could not be verified, and product quality deficiency could not be determined.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing records for the intraocular lens were reviewed.The product was manufactured according to specifications.The search revealed that no similar complaint for this production order number has been received.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation, there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This correction mdr is being submitted to address inaccurate information in section f on the xml version of the previous submission caused by a software glitch in the transmission process.The internal non-conformance numbers for this software issue are (b)(4) and capa-010215.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS
Common Device Name
MONOFOCAL IOLS
Manufacturer (Section D)
JOHNSON & JOHNSON SURGICAL VISION, INC.
1700 e st andrew place
santa ana CA 92705
MDR Report Key8964422
Report Number2648035-2019-00969
Device Sequence Number2444622
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474529090
UDI-Public(01)05050474529090(17)210621
Combination Product (Y/N)Y
Initial Reporter StatePA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P990080
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source health professional,user faci
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 11/11/2020
Report Date (Section F) 01/01/2005
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/21/2021
Device Model NumberZA9003
Device Catalogue NumberZA90030240
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/04/2019
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/12/2019
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer09/04/2019
10/25/2020
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/05/2019
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/01/2019
11/11/2020
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age82 YR
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
-
-