|
Review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.There have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.It was noted that the device is not available for evaluation.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.The information in this report was provided by stryker orthopaedics legal affairs department.No additional information is available at this time due to the ongoing litigation.Should additional information become available, the evaluation summary will be submitted in a supplemental report.Device not returned.
|
|
Reported event: an event regarding instability involving a triathlon patella was reported.The event was confirmed.Method & results: product evaluation and results: material analysis, visual, functional and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device was not returned.Medical records received and evaluation: a review with a clinical consultant indicated "confirmation of event: based upon information provided i can confirm that the patient underwent a total knee arthroplasty on (b)(6) 2012 and underwent revision presumably for instability on (b)(6) 2013.Aiding in corroborating this are the grids which provide evidence of product usage.Root cause analysis: the root cause of this event cannot be determined information supplied.The root causes of revision for an unstable total knee arthroplasty are multifactorial including surgical technique factors, patient factors including stretching of the ligament envelope, lifestyle, activity level and bmi." product history review: a review of the device manufacturing records indicate that all devices accepted into final stock were free from discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: a review with a clinical consultant indicated "confirmation of event: based upon information provided i can confirm that the patient underwent a total knee arthroplasty on (b)(6) 2012 and underwent revision presumably for instability on (b)(6) 2013.Aiding in corroborating this are the grids which provide evidence of product usage.Root cause analysis: the root cause of this event cannot be determined information supplied.The root causes of revision for an unstable total knee arthroplasty are multifactorial including surgical technique factors, patient factors including stretching of the ligament envelope, lifestyle, activity level and bmi.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If devices and / or additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
|