| Catalog Number |
5630-G-308 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Pain (1994); Injury (2348)
|
| Date of Event |
01/10/2012
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The information in this report was provided by stryker orthopaedics legal affairs department.No additional information is available at this time due to the ongoing litigation.Should additional information become available, the evaluation summary will be submitted in a supplemental report.Review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.There have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.It was noted that the device is not available for evaluation.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.The following devices were also listed in this report: unknown_joint replacement_product; cat# unk_jr; lot# unknown triathlon pkr femur #3 lm/rl; cat# 5610-f-301; lot# fkji triathlon pkr baseplate #3 lm/rl; cat# 5620-b-301; lot# fnnva it cannot be determined which, if any of these devices may have caused or contributed to the patient's experience.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
This pi is for left knee.It was reported through the communication of an attorney that allegedly the patient was revised due to a failed left unicompartmental arthroplasty.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
This pi is for left knee.It was reported through the communication of an attorney that allegedly the patient was revised due to a failed left unicompartmental arthroplasty.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
An event regarding patient factors involving a triathlon insert was reported.The event was confirmed by a medical review.Method & results product evaluation and results: material analysis, visual, functional and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device was not returned.Medical records received and evaluation: clinician review: clinician review: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated: left knee complaints developed soon after left pkr, mostly located on the antero-medial joint side within a year as reported already in nov 2012.Because pain symptoms did not improve, an indication for arthroscopy of the left knee was made and as such performed on (b)(6) 2012.A generalised grade-3 oa was observed in the pf joint and trochlea (femoral side of the pf-joint) with the pkr devices well fixed to the bone.The acl (anterior cruciate ligament) and lateral compartment were evaluated as ¿intact.¿ complaints were concluded to be caused by the pf joint problem.Conservative treatment for the left knee was initiated for a while but because of lack of clinical progress, a decision for a left knee revision was made indicated by disease progress in the pf-joint with a planned conversion of the pkr to total knee.Disease progress did thus represent the principal failure mode of the left knee and this is primarily a patient-related failure mode although the aspect of indication for partial knee resurfacing in a knee with more than one compartment affected by oa relates to surgical decision making.A somewhat questionable indication for partial knee replacement in a joint with more than one compartment affected by oa thus still has procedure-related aspects with regard to suboptimal surgical decision making.Conclusion of assessment degenerative disease progress in the patellofemoral joint with only the medial compartment replaced by a triathlon pkr device has contributed to rapid development of new pain symptoms requiring conversion surgery to total knee replacement.The patient's obesity (bmi = 31) represents only a marginal secondary factor although surgical decision making for a partial knee replacement in a knee with already more than one compartment affected by osteoarthritis at time of primary arthroplasty represents an additional procedure related failure contributing factor to indicate revision surgery.Does the review identify any procedural related factors that contributed to the event? surgical decision making for a partial knee replacement in a knee with already more than one compartment affected by osteoarthritis at time of primary arthroplasty component malposition or issues with cementation cannot be excluded until proof of contrary by x-ray information.Does the review identify any patient related factors that contributed to the event? degenerative disease progress in the patellofemoral joint with only the medial compartment replaced by a triathlon pkr device.Patient obesity (bmi = 31) represents a marginal secondary factor.Does the review identify any device related factors that caused or contributed to the adverse event? no device-related factors are associated with any of the implanted devices.Product history review: a review of the device manufacturing records indicate that all devices accepted into final stock were free from discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been one other similar event for the lot referenced.Medical review performed as part of pi where it was identified an "arthroscopy of the left knee" had taken place on (b)(6) 2012.Conclusions: degenerative disease progress in the patellofemoral joint with only the medial compartment replaced by a triathlon pkr device has contributed to rapid development of new pain symptoms requiring conversion surgery to total knee replacement.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If devices and/or additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|