Catalog Number 306594 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction (1907)
|
Event Date 08/10/2019 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A device evaluation and/or device history review is anticipated, but is not complete.Upon completion, a supplemental report will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that bd posiflush¿ syringe was used and the patient had an allergic reaction.This was discovered after use.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: patient, female, was admitted to hospital on (b)(6) 2019 for "chronic superficial dermatitis".After infusion at 17:01 on (b)(6), she was flushed with a flush.After half an hour, the patient developed an allergic reaction.On the chest and back of both upper and lower limbs, there were rashes of different sizes , accompanied by obvious itching.Immediately, 10 mg of chlorpheniramine maleate injection and 5 mg of dexamethasone sodium phosphate injection was injected intramuscularly.After half an hour, the rash subsided.Recurrence, no flusher after use.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that bd posiflush¿ syringe was used and the patient had an allergic reaction.This was discovered after use.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: patient, female, was admitted to hospital on (b)(6) 2019 for "chronic superficial dermatitis".After infusion at 17:01 on (b)(6) 2019 , she was flushed with a flush.After half an hour, the patient developed an allergic reaction.On the chest and back of both upper and lower limbs, there were rashes of different sizes , accompanied by obvious itching.Immediately, 10 mg of chlorpheniramine maleate injection and 5 mg of dexamethasone sodium phosphate injection was injected intramuscularly.After half an hour, the rash subsided.Recurrence, no flusher after use.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H.6.Investigation: since no samples displaying the condition reported are available for examination, we were unable to fully investigate this incident, therefore a root cause could not be determined.Furthermore, a device history record review showed no rejected inspections or quality issues during the production of the provided lot number that could have contributed to the reported defect.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|