|
Model Number G18343 |
Device Problems
Use of Device Problem (1670); Material Protrusion/Extrusion (2979)
|
Patient Problems
Tissue Damage (2104); No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation evaluation: our laboratory evaluation of the product said to be involved could not confirm the report as it was described, because all the device components (particularly the clip) were not included in the return.During functional testing the device was advanced into the accessory channel which was placed in a simulated lower gi position.The tip of the endoscope was retroflexed to simulate worst case scenario.With handle manipulation, the drive wire was observed to move freely inside the outer sheath.A visual examination of the drive wire hook, catheter attachment, and coil catheter (distal end device components) showed no deformities or signs of damage.A product discrepancy or anomaly that could have contributed to the reported occurrence was not observed.The device history record for the lot number said to be involved was reviewed.A discrepancy or anomaly was not observed with the product that was released for distribution.Investigation conclusion: a definitive cause for the reported observation could not be determined because the condition of the product said to be involved prohibited a complete evaluation, the clip had been deployed and was not included in the return.A discrepancy or anomaly that could have contributed to the reported observation was not observed during our laboratory analysis of the returned product.The instructions for use states: "after clip deployment, continue to apply slight pressure on handle spool as device is removed from endoscope." this process would prevent inadvertent contact of the hook end of the drive wire with tissue.Prior to distribution, all instinct endoscopic hemoclips are subjected to a visual inspection and functional testing to ensure device integrity.A review of the device history record confirmed that the lot said to be involved met all manufacturing requirements prior to shipment.Corrective action: a review of the complaint history was conducted.The likelihood of occurrence is considered rare.Corrective action is not warranted at this time based on the quality engineering risk assessment.Quality assurance will continue to monitor for complaint trends and reassess the risk assessment results as post market feedback continues to become available.Additional comments regarding this report: based on the information provided that suggests slight pressure was not applied to handle spool to retract the clip hook, a cook representative has been directed to contact the medical facility involved in an effort to promote further education and understanding related to appropriate usage of this product.
|
|
Event Description
|
During a colonoscopy, the physician used a cook instinct endoscopic hemoclip.Post deployment of the clip, the hook at the end of the catheter became embedded in the mucosa of the patient.After trying to get the device out, it had to be torn out; minor damage was incurred, but no interventional procedure was needed.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|