| Model Number |
G31583 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Failure to Align (2522)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
07/22/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The product was returned for evaluation and the investigation is on-going.A follow-up emdr will be provided within 30 days of submission of this report with product evaluation information.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
During an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (egd), the physician used a cook captura hot biopsy forceps.The biopsy forcep broke during the procedure.The device was removed and [the procedure was] completed with another device.There was no reportable information at this time.The device was evaluated on 15-aug-2019 and it was determined that the cups have a gap in between teeth.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Investigation evaluation: our laboratory evaluation of the product said to be involved confirmed the report.The device was returned with the sheath cut at 223.5cm.The link wires are sticking out and severely bent to one side, causing the cups to tilt over to the opposite side.The cups are not fully closed and have a gap in between them.The damaged link wires are restricting the cups from coming together and fully closing.The forcep could not be manipulated due to the device being cut.The device was sent back to the supplier for a full evaluation.The supplier provided the following evaluation: one device from the reported event was returned inside of a zip type bag with proof of decontamination.Visual evaluation: the device was visually evaluated.No defects to the handle were noted.The catheter/sheath was severed at approximately 224 cm at the distal end.The link wires were also severely damaged and bent.Additionally, the cups are tilted and exhibit a gap in between them.The reported event for "broke" forceps was confirmed.Functional evaluation: the device could not be functionally evaluated due to damage.The device history records for packaging work order was reviewed.The manufacturing records and/or final quality control checklist did indicate relevant defects.The device history record for the lot number said to be involved was reviewed.A discrepancy or anomaly was not observed with the product that was released for distribution.Investigation conclusion: the supplier provided the following: the reported issue from the user that 'forcep broke' was confirmed.The customer's reported issue for 'link wires sticking out and bent' was confirmed.The condition of the returned device would not have passed final inspection and release.All devices receive a 100% inspection prior to shipment.Prior to distribution, all captura hot biopsy forceps are subjected to a visual inspection and functional test to ensure proper workability.A review of the device history record confirmed that the lot said to be involved met all manufacturing requirements prior to shipment.Corrective action: a review of the complaint history was conducted.The likelihood of occurrence is considered rare.Corrective action is not warranted at this time based on the quality engineering risk assessment.Quality assurance will continue to monitor for complaint trends and reassess the risk assessment results as post market feedback continues to become available.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
During an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (egd), the physician used a cook captura hot biopsy forceps.The biopsy forcep broke during the procedure.The device was removed and [the procedure was] completed with another device.There was no reportable information at this time.The device was evaluated on 15-aug-2019 and it was determined that the cups have a gap in between the cups edges.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|