| Catalog Number |
NSLG2S25 |
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
08/14/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Batch # unknown.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device and no non-conformances were identified.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date, a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Additional information requested but not received: did the surgeon attempt to manually open the jaws with his fingers? if no, was the device on a vessel/artery when it would not open? if yes, how was the device removed? (i.E.Cut off, forced opened).If cut off, did this cause a change in the plan of care for the patient? did the removal cause any damage to the vessel/artery? if yes, what is the damage and how was the damage repaired?.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a colon surgery, the device fails presenting a blockage in the jaw and does not open, the surgeon had to use electro-scalpel to remove the fragment of tissue that was trapped in the jaw, the generator asked for a device change.A new device was used to successfully complete the procedure.The procedure was not delayed due to the reported event.There were no adverse consequences for the patient.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Batch # p92f5h.Investigation summary: the device was received with no apparent damage.The device was tested on the generator and passed all functional testing.The energy output delivered from the device was verified.All three tones were heard during functional testing (tone 1 is heard when the energy activation button is pressed; tone 2 is heard when tissue impedance threshold is reached and tone 3 is heard when the cycle is complete).No issues were noted with opening and closing of the jaws.There were no anomalies noted with the functionality of the device.There may have been other circumstances or issues that occurred during the use of the device that we were unable to duplicate during our laboratory analysis.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device batch number, and no non-conformances were identified.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|