| Model Number |
G50622 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
08/13/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Pma/510(k) # : k163018.Investigation is still pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
User advanced the device through endoscopy but found out the stent premature released 0.5cm while passing duodenal papilla which cause the device cannot enter bile duct.User retracted the device from patient and checked the device found out the stent cannot be retracted back into delivery system.User changed another same device to complete the procedure.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
User advanced the device through endoscopy but found out the stent premature released 0.5cm while passing duodenal papilla which cause the device cannot enter bile duct.User retracted the device from patient and checked the device found out the stent cannot be retracted back into delivery system.User changed another same device to complete the procedure.Fda mdr reporting required: event is fda mdr reportable based on the device malfunction reporting precedence for this device family for the issue of ¿premature stent deployment with safety lock in place¿.No adverse effects to the patient have been reported as occurring.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Pma/510(k) # : k163018.Device evaluation: this file (b)(4)) is related to (b)(4).For details of the second investigation please refer to (b)(4) (kink on the peek observed during lab evaluation).The zilbs-635-6-8 device of lot number c1447546 involved in this complaint was returned for evaluation, with the original packaging.The packaging was open on receipt.With the information provided, a physical examination and document based investigation was conducted.Lab evaluation: the device related to this occurrence underwent a laboratory evaluation on the 05 september 2019.On evaluation of the device, a kink was observed on the peek at the distal end of the device and the stent was partially deployed.Document review: prior to distribution zilbs-635-6-8 devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.These inspections and functional checks are outlined in internal procedures in place at cirl.A review of the manufacturing records for zilbs-635-6-8 of lot number c1447546 did not reveal any discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint issue.The review of relevant manufacturing records, confirms the failure mode has not previously occurred with the current lot number.Based on the information available to date, there is no evidence to suggest that there are any manufacturing issues associated with lot number c1447546.It should be noted that the instructions for use (ifu0065-3) instructs the user to do the following; ¿upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred.If the package is opened or damaged when received, do not use the device.Visually inspect the device with particular attention to kinks, bends or breaks.If an abnormality is detected that would prohibit proper working condition, do not use the device.¿ there is no evidence to suggest that the customer did not follow the instructions for use.Root cause review: a definitive root cause could not be determined as the circumstances of use cannot be replicated in the laboratory.A possible root cause could be attributed to difficult patient anatomy.From the information provided it is known that the physician felt resistance as the device was advanced through the obstructed area.It is possible that a difficult patient anatomy caused and/or contributed to resistance and high compressive force on the flexor during advancement through the obstructed area.It is possible that compression of the flexor resulted in the partial premature deployment of the stent.Summary: complaint is confirmed as the failure was verified in the laboratory.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|