| Catalog Number |
5650-4-512A |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare (1487); Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Bone Fracture(s) (1870); Injury (2348)
|
| Date of Event |
08/06/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Review of the product history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.There have been no other events for the lot referenced.Device evaluation is anticipated but not yet begun.A supplemental report will be submitted upon completion of the investigation.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6) 2019 knee joint replacement did.On (b)(6) 2019, the patient complained of pain and had a fracture in the tibia.At first, dr.Decided that it was a technical problem, but there was a fracture starting from the extension of the inner peg.# 2 had the same length as the peg # 3, # 1 and # 2 are too long.There are no revisions, etc., and follow-up is in progress.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
An event regarding a size/fit issue and periprosthetic fracture involving a triathlon drill bit was reported.The event was not confirmed as the drill bit was identified to be adhering to manufacturing specifications.Method & results: device evaluation and results: visual inspection: visual inspection of the returned part had nothing remarkable to document.Dimensional inspection: the device is dimensionally within specification as per inspection completed by quality control/inspection.Inspection attached.Functional inspection: not performed as the functional aspects are not in question.Material analysis material evaluation was completed and indicated the following comments:ma: material analysis is not performed as this is not related to material integrity.Perform dimensional inspection.Clinician review: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant stated the following comment: cannot confirm event, need additional information; primary and revision operative reports, clinical and past medical history, additional serial dated x-rays and examination of explanted components.Device history review: all devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the reported lot.Conclusion: the exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Additional information including operative reports are needed to fully investigate the event.If further information becomes available, this investigation will be re-opened.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
(b)(6) 2019 knee joint replacement did.(b)(6) 2019,the patient complained of pain and had a fracture in the tibia.At first, dr.Decided that it was a technical problem, but there was a fracture starting from the extension of the inner peg.# 2 had the same length as the peg # 3, # 1 and # 2 are too long.There are no revisions, etc., and follow- up is in progress.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|