| Catalog Number |
A2040-120 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Inflation Problem (1310); Material Rupture (1546); Deformation Due to Compressive Stress (2889)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
07/18/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Exemption number e2019001-permits numbering sequence to begin with 10000, to avoid duplication of report numbers due to process transition.There may be gaps in numbering for reports submitted during the transition period.The device was received.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the procedure was performed to treat a lesion in the moderately calcified, 60% stenosed left popliteal and tibial arteries.The 4x120mm armada 14 percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta) balloon catheter was advanced without resistance, but when attempting to inflate the balloon, the pta completely failed to inflate despite holding pressure.The device was removed with no issue; however, the shaft was noted to be smashed, and a balloon rupture had occurred at an unknown pressure.A 3x120mm armada was used to successfully complete the procedure.There were no adverse patient effects and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Exemption number e2019001.Visual and functional analysis was performed on the returned device.The reported shaft damage and balloon rupture was confirmed.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no indication of a lot specific product issue.The investigation determined that the reported difficulties were likely due to case related circumstances.It is likely that the rupture occurred due to interaction with lesion calcification.Additionally, the damage to the shaft was also likely related to anatomical conditions.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|