|
(b)(4).Date of event: unknown, assumed the 1st day of month that complaint was reported.Additional information received: 75 inches, (b)(6) lbs, 27.5 bmi.There was a hiatal hernia repair completed at time of implant.First implant done on (b)(6) 2015.Bravo capsule test on (b)(6) 2015: heartburn, chest pain, regurgitation, pain, belching, bloating, gas, diarrhea.Patient has had persistent reflux since his initial linx surgery; symptoms had improved, remained on ppis.Had an endoscopy as part of pas follow up and was found to have an enlarged hiatal hernia.Surgeon discussed repair of the hernia, the patient wanted to proceed.(b)(6).
|
|
(b)(4).Device analysis: overall review of the device function and dimensions show no anomalies from a device that has been reasonably changed as part of the explant procedure.Visual analysis was consistent with an explanted device, and link length and tensile force were found to meet the applicable specifications.Overall, no analysis conclusions relevant to the patient experience were found.The dhr for lot 6275 was reviewed.No ncs, defects, or reworks related to the product complaint were found.
|