Correction: from "required intervention." to no input.Correction: updated from 'stryker spine- leesburg' to 'k2m, inc.' visual inspection observed that the distal tip of the screw was fractured.The fracture occurs across the fenestrations at the distal end of the threaded shaft.X-rays were reviewed, and it appeared that the left screw at s1 was broken at the distal tip.Material analysis determined there to be material fatigue.The fracture occurs across the fenestrations, so it is possible that minor dynamic stresses were translated to these stress-concentrators, compounding over time and leading to a failure in fatigue.Device and complaint history records were reviewed, no relevant manufacturing or similar complaints were identified.Per surgical technique: patient selection and compliance is extremely important.Based on fatigue testing results, the k2m range spinal system has been determined to be substantially equivalent to predicate devices however, the physician/surgeon should consider the levels of implantation, patient weight, patient activity level, other patient conditions, etc., which may impact on the performance of this system.Spinal implant surgery on patients with conditions listed under contraindications may not be candidates for this procedure.The patient must be made aware of the limitations of the implant and that physical activity and load bearing have been implicated in premature loosening, bending or fracture of internal fixation devices.The patient should understand that a metallic implant is not as strong as a normal, healthy bone and will fracture under normal load bearing in the absence of complete bone healing.An active, debilitated or uncooperative patient who cannot properly restrict activities may be at particular risk during postoperative rehabilitation.Potential risks identified with the use of this device system which may require additional surgery include device component failure, loss of fixation, non-union, fracture of the vertebra, and neurological, vascular or visceral injury.Cutting, bending, or scratching the surface of metal components can significantly reduce the strength and resistance of the implant system and should be avoided where possible.These, in turn may cause cracks and/or internal stresses that are not obvious to the eye and may lead to fracture of the components.Especially avoid sharp or reverse bends and notches.Implanting metals and alloys in the human body subjects them to a constantly changing environment of salts, acids and alkalis which can cause corrosion.Putting dissimilar metals (e.G.Titanium and stainless steel) in contact with each other can accelerate the corrosion process which in turn may enhance fatigue fractures of implants.Thus ever effort should be made to use compatible metals and alloys.Fretting or wear at the interface between components of a device may also accelerate the corrosion process and may lead to the generation of wear debris which has been associated with localized inflammatory response.After reviewing the complaint with everest engineers and examining similar incidents, the root cause was determined to be material fatigue.
|