|
|
| Catalog Number |
0112670 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Device Appears to Trigger Rejection (1524); Defective Device (2588); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Nerve Damage (1979); Pain (1994); Scar Tissue (2060); Hernia (2240); Injury (2348); Disability (2371); Fibrosis (3167); Neuralgia (4413)
|
| Date of Event |
08/10/2015
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made regarding the bard/davol flat mesh (device #2) used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney did allege injuries and revision surgery; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided therefore a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.This emdr represents the bard/davol kugel flat mesh (device #2).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol flat kugel patch (device #1).The patient's attorney did not make any allegations regarding the implanted bard/davol 3dmax device.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that on (b)(6) 2013, the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol kugel hernia patch (device#1).It is alleged that on (b)(6) 2014, the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol bard mesh (device #2).As alleged, on (b)(6) 2015, the patient had unspecified injuries related to a defect in the kugel hernia patch (device #1) and bard mesh (device #2) and underwent revision surgery and implant of an unspecified bard/davol 3dmax light.As reported, the patient is only making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the kugel hernia patch and bard mesh.As reported, the attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient.".
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that on (b)(6) 2013, the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol kugel hernia patch (device#1).It is alleged that on (b)(6) 2014, the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol bard mesh (device #2).As alleged, on (b)(6) 2015, the patient had unspecified injuries related to a defect in the kugel hernia patch (device #1) and bard mesh (device #2) and underwent revision surgery and implant of an unspecified bard/davol 3dmax light.As reported, the patient is only making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the kugel hernia patch and bard mesh.As reported, the attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2013 - patient was diagnosed with bilateral inguinal hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of kugel hernia patch (device #1 & #2).Per operative notes, ¿the hernia sac was identified in right inguinal region and reduced.A kugel patch (device #1) was placed using sutures.The hernia sac was identified and reduced in left inguinal region.A kugel patch (device #2) was placed using sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2014 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent right inguinal hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of bard flat mesh (device #3).Per operative notes, ¿the prior kugel patch (device #1) appears to be displaced and migrated to hernia sac.The hernia contents were identified and reduced.A bard flat mesh (device #3) was placed and sutured.¿ (b)(6) 2015 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent right inguinal hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with partial excision of mesh (device #1 & #3) and implant of 3dmax light (device #4).Per operative notes, ¿the protruding mesh was cut and dissected off from abdominal wall.The scarring of nerve was identified.A small hernia defect was identified and repaired using 3dmax light (device #4) and tacked.¿ (b)(6) 2017 - patient was diagnosed with right groin pain and neuralgia thereby underwent open repair with removal of mesh (device #1 & #3) and resection of nerves.Per operative notes, ¿moderate amount of scarring was excised.The prior mesh (device #1 & #3) with suture material was removed entirely.Three nerves were resected and sutured.¿.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made regarding the bard/davol flat mesh (device #2) used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney did allege injuries and revision surgery; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided therefore a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-mar-2012) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, b2, b3, b4, b5, b6, b7, d3, d4, d.6b (date of explant), g1, g3, g4, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10.This supplemental emdr represents the bard flat mesh (device #3).Additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol kugel patch (device #1) and an emdr was submitted for bard/davol 3dmax light (device #4).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text: not returned.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|