|
The suspected device was returned for evaluation.The lot number on the used/returned device was 93k 20; different than the reported 95k lot.A visual inspection was performed on the returned device, but was unable to perform a functional inspection, since the clip had already been deployed and was not returned for testing.Additionally, the distal end portion of the device has foreign material which is indicative of usage.There are no damages to the insertion tube, sheath, control section, or distal end portion.The slider handle controls the clip and maneuvers freely.Additionally, the user facility returned a box of five unopened/sealed (lot 93k 20) devices for evaluation due to, ¿the clip fell apart and had to be retrieved using the scope¿.A visual inspection was performed on two out of the five new devices and there was no issues found during the evaluation.There was no damage noted to the actual packaging or to the contents inside.After opening the package, a visual inspection was performed on the physical devices, there was no abnormalities to the control section, insertion portion or the distal portion.The slider handle manipulates without restriction, and the insertion portion has no kinks, dents, or damages.The clip was then extended from the sheath at the distal end side.The handle was rotated numerous times in order to verify that the movement of the clip reacts to the movement from the handle; the handle and clip move freely.Additionally, the slider handle was manipulated and the clips open and close as intended.A deployment test was performed.Upon deployment, a noticeable clicking sound was made, and the clip was released from the device, attaching itself to the test material.Based on the evaluation results, the exact cause of the reported event could not be confirmed.
|