| Model Number |
9004 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Reocclusion (1985)
|
| Date of Event |
02/26/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturing review: lot history review revealed there are two (2) total complaints for corporate lot number gfbv4115.Both of the complaints are related to an allegation of reocclusion, which includes this complaint.A dhr review was conducted and there was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the sample was not returned by the facility for further evaluation.It is known that approximately 6 months post index procedure, the target lesion was reportedly reoccluded.A revascularization was performed and the hcp deemed it was successful.The investigator assessed that the event was not related to the study device or procedure.No adverse patient outcomes were reported.However, the lack of further information or the returned sample prevents both confirmation of the reported event and identification of a root cause(s).Label review: based on the instructions for use (ifu), the occurrence of reocclusion is an inherent risk of any pta procedure, and has been reported in clinical trials of drug coated balloons.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through a post market clinical study that during the index procedure, a lutonix percutaneous transluminal drug coated balloon (dcb) dilatation catheter was used to treat the target lesion located in the right femoral artery.Approximately 6 months after the index procedure, the patient¿s right femoral artery was reportedly reoccluded.A revascularization was performed and the health care professional (hcp) deemed it was successful.The investigator assessed that the event was not related to the study device or procedure.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: lot history review revealed there are two (2) total complaints for corporate lot number gfbv4115.Both of the complaints are related to an allegation of reocclusion, which includes this complaint.A dhr review was conducted and there was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the sample was not returned by the facility for further evaluation.It is known that approximately 6 months post index procedure, the target lesion was reportedly reoccluded.A revascularization was performed and the hcp deemed it was successful.The investigator assessed that the event was not related to the study device, but possibly related to the procedure.No adverse patient outcomes were reported.However, the lack of further information or the returned sample prevents both confirmation of the reported event and identification of a root cause(s).Label review: based on the instructions for use (ifu), the occurrence of reocclusion is an inherent risk of any pta procedure, and has been reported in clinical trials of drug coated balloons.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through a post market clinical study that during the index procedure, a lutonix percutaneous transluminal drug coated balloon (dcb) dilatation catheter was used to treat the target lesion located in the right femoral artery.Approximately 6 months after the index procedure, the patient¿s right femoral artery was reportedly reoccluded.A revascularization was performed and the health care professional (hcp) deemed it was successful.The investigator assessed that the event was not related to the study device but possibly related to the procedure.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|