|
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH TRI PRESS-FIT STEM 15X150MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, CO
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
5566-S-015 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Break (1069); Fracture (1260); Material Fragmentation (1261); Osseointegration Problem (3003)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Pain (1994); Injury (2348); Inadequate Osseointegration (2646)
|
| Date of Event |
08/28/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.There have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.It was noted that the device is not available for evaluation.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient's left knee was revised after patient complaint of sharp tibial pain.The original surgical plan was to perform a poly swap.Intra-operatively, the surgeon noted the presence of black, metallic debris in the patient.The surgeon found the tibial component was loose and that the device had broken at the stem/ baseplate junction.The patient was revised to another universal baseplate with stem and insert.Rep confirmed there are no allegations against the insert, and that the femoral component was well-fixed and not revised.Rep provided pre-revision x-rays and explant pictures, and reported that no further information will be available.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient's left knee was revised after patient complaint of sharp tibial pain.The original surgical plan was to perform a poly swap.Intra-operatively, the surgeon noted the presence of black, metallic debris in the patient.The surgeon found the tibial component was loose and that the device had broken at the stem/ baseplate junction.The patient was revised to another universal baseplate with stem and insert.Rep confirmed there are no allegations against the insert, and that the femoral component was well-fixed and not revised.Rep provided pre-revision x-rays and explant pictures, and reported that no further information will be available.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
An event regarding crack/fracture, loosening and fretting involving a triathlon stem was reported.The crack/fracture event was confirmed via medical review and product inspection.Method & results product evaluation and results: visual inspection: visual inspection of the returned device noted the following: a part of the threaded portion of the stem remained threaded in the socket of the tibial baseplate.The fracture surface, associated with the stem section within the socket, exhibits damage consistent with post fracture abrasion.Damage consistent with the explantation process was observed on the main stem body and threads.Bone cement was observed on the main body of the stem.Damage consistent with post fracture abrasion was observed on the threads and on the distal fracture surface.Macroscopic surface features beach marks indicate directionality of fracture.The fracture originated in the anterior region and propagated in the posterior direction.The location of final fracture could not be determined.The fracture surface associated with the proximal portion of the stem was further examined using a scanning electron microscope sem.Dimensional inspection: dimensional inspection was not performed because the event does not relate to device dimensions.Functional inspection: functional inspection was not performed because the event does not relate to device function.Material analysis: material analysis of the returned device noted the following: the stem fractured in fatigue at the threaded portion, indicated by the observed striations.Optically observed macroscopic surface features beach marks indicate directionality of the fracture which originated in the anterior region and propagated in the posterior direction.Bone cement was observed on the tibial baseplate and stem.Damage consistent with the explantation process was observed on the baseplate and stem.Elemental analysis confirmed the base material of the baseplate is consistent with an astm f75 alloy and the base material of the stem is consistent with an astm f136 alloy.Based on the given information, no identifiable material or manufacturing discrepancies were observed on the surfaces examined.-medical records received and evaluation: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant stated the following comment: x-rays provided confirm fracture at the stem/baseplate junction, need additional information; primary and revision operative reports, clinical and past medical history.-product history review: a review of the device manufacturing records indicate that all devices accepted into final stock were free from discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant stated the following comment: x-rays provided confirm fracture at the stem/baseplate junction, need additional information; primary and revision operative reports, clinical and past medical history.The exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Further information such as pathology reports, pre- and post-operative x-rays and the primary operative report as well as patient history and follow- up notes are needed to complete the investigation for determining root cause.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|