|
It was reported that during the insertion of a tunneled central line, as the wire guide of the peel-away denny sheath introducer set was being pulled back to reposition, the soft tip off the wire got caught on the needle, unfolded, and formed a knot.Due to the knot formation, an incision was required to be made in the neck of the patient to expose and control the internal jugular vein.The vein was then opened to remove the knotted guide wire safely.The incision was sutured and a third attempt for insertion was made at a different site.Another like device from a different lot experienced a similar failure during the procedure.That device failure was captured in the report with patient identifier: (b)(6).Patient information including demographics and pre-existing conditions was not provided by the facility.
|
|
Additional information - concomitant medical product received.Investigation - evaluation.A review of the documentation including the complaint history, device history record (dhr), manufacturing instructions (mi) and quality control, as well as dimensional verification and visual inspection of the returned device was conducted during the investigation.One piece of the distal end portion of the wire guide was returned for investigation.Upon visual inspection, biomatter was noted on the coils throughout the wire guide.The distal tip bond weld was present, a knot was noted in the wire guide near the distal tip.No separation or elongation was present throughout the wire guide, though the wire was noted to have multiple kinks.The coil was broken at two spots with biomatter present in between the two offset coil sections.This complaint was able to be confirmed based on both customer testimony and inspection of the returned device.Cook has concluded that there is no evidence to suggest that this device was manufactured out of specification.Additionally, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.Cook has concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.Analysis of the design history file indicates that the risks associated with the devices are acceptable when weighed against the benefits.A review of the device history record (dhr) for the complaint lot (9736473) found one recorded unrelated non-conformance for foreign matter.The dhr for the sub-assembly wire guide lot (ic9600970) found one non-conformance for a break in the tip of the weld which was found to be related to this incident.This non-conformance affected a total quantity of one and was ultimately scrapped.Furthermore, a database search found no additional complaints related to the complaint lot.As there are adequate inspection activities established, objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no additional complaints from the same lot, cook has concluded that there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in field.Cook could not review the product labeling because no ifu (instructions for use) exists for rpn: plip-6.0-18-9-denny.Based on the information provided, evaluation of the returned device, and the results of our investigation, a definitive root cause was traced to the user as an unintended use error that caused or contributed to the event.It was reported by the customer that the guide wire was pulled back for repositioning.Therefore, the soft tip got caught in the needle.The guide wire should not be removed through the needle.Pulling the guide wire back to reposition can cause the wire guide to get caught on the sharp edge of the needle and can cause separation and damage to the wire guide.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Per the quality engineering risk assessment no further action is required.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|