| Model Number |
N/A |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Activation Failure (3270)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
08/28/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Implanted date: device was not implanted.Explanted date: device was not explanted.The actual device has been returned for evaluation.The investigation is currently ongoing.A follow up report will be submitted once the investigation is complete.A review of the device history record of the product code/lot# combination was conducted with no findings.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The user facility reported that the angio-seal device did not deploy correctly and the whole system came out when trying to seal.The patient was in stable condition.The procedure outcome was completed.Additional information was received 05 september 2019: the procedure was an aortogram with lle angio (right groin access) with a 6fr procedural sheath.There was no difficulties with arterial access, it was a clean femoral artery.There was not a pre-deployment angiogram performed; an ultrasound was used with access and above and below access point examined.When the angio-seal sheath was inserted, and blood flow was identified, the inner dilator was removed and implant device was inserted.Insertion and pull back on deployment was as normal, but when they pulled everything out to expose the stitch to tamp down, the whole device came out.The inner arterial disk was seen peeking out of the catheter.Pressure was held for 5-10 minutes with good hemostasis.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted as follow up no.1 to update the h3 section and to provide the completed investigation results.H6 - results - 114 is based on evaluation of user facility information & the returned sample; 213 is based upon functional testing of the returned sample.H6 - conclusion - 4310 is based upon evaluation of user facility information & the returned sample; 67 is based upon functional testing of the returned sample.One 6 fr angio-seal sts plus device was received for product evaluation.The carrier tube assembly was returned mated with the hemostasis sheath.The completely opened poly foil pouch was returned as well.No other accessory components were returned with the device.Visual inspection revealed that the carrier tube assembly was found to be mated with the hemostasis sheath and the deployment sleeve was in the full rear lock position.The anchor had not fully exited at the distal tip of the hemostasis sheath as would be expected when the deployment sleeve was in the rear lock position.Microscopic analysis of the distal tip of the sheath revealed that the anchor was still present within the sheath.No other visual anomalies were noted with the device.Functional testing was conducted.The deployment sleeve was manually moved into the forward lock position, which caused the anchor and distal tip of the carrier tube to become exposed.The deployment sleeve was then moved into the rear lock position and the anchor posted to the sheath.The digital force was applied to the anchor and the suture unspooled as intended with collagen but tamper tube did not exit from the sheath.No other functional anomalies were noted with the device.Then, the device was dissected to discover the cause of obstruction.The carrier tube was cut and the presence of the tamper tube was confirmed.Dried blood-like substances were observed on the tamper tube.Excessive blood-like substance was also noted within the carrier tube.There were no anomalies were noted with the tamper tube.The outer diameter tamper tube was dimensionally measured and found to be 0.059''.All measurements were found to be within the specifications defined in the engineering drawings active at the time of manufacturing.Based on the provided information and investigation results there is no evidence that this event was related to a device defect or malfunction.Based on the investigation results, it is likely that the device was not placed in the full forward lock position, or an obstruction to the anchor posting to the distal tip.However, the exact cause of the reported event cannot be definitely determined based on the available information.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|