(b)(6).Investigation: visual inspection: no significant deformations or damage of the valve were detected during the visual inspection.Permeability test: a permeability test has shown that the valve is permeable.Adjustment test: this is a fixed pressure valve.An adjustment test is not applicable.Braking force and brake function test this is a fixed pressure valve.A braking force and brake function test is not applicable.Computer controlled test: to investigate the claim of over- drainage, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer controlled testing apparatus, which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.The valve is tested in the vertical position.The results show that the valve operates within the accepted tolerance.Results first, we performed a visual inspection of the shunt assistant 2.0.No significant deformations or damage of the valve were detected during the visual inspection.Next, we tested the permeability of the valve.The valve was shown to be permeable.Then we carried out a computer controlled simulated flow test.The measured opening pressure was within the accepted tolerance.Finally, we have dismantled the valve.There were no visible deposits observed inside the valve.Based on our investigation, we are unable to substantiate the claim of occlusion and over- drainage.At the time of our investigation, the valve was shown to be permeable and the measured opening pressure was within the accepted tolerance.Despite the lack of significant deposits, it is possible that even non-visible or small amounts of build-up could have led to a temporary compromise of the valve and to the observed malfunction in the past.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The valve met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.
|