| Catalog Number |
0112950 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Adhesion(s) (1695); Scar Tissue (2060); Hernia (2240); Injury (2348)
|
| Date of Event |
11/30/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges subsequent surgery; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol perfix plug on (b)(6) 2013.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device(s).As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the bard/davol perfix plug.As reported, the attorney alleges patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges subsequent surgery; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-sep-2011) is considered to be a best estimate.This supplemental emdr represents the perfix plug (device #1).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the perfix plug (device #2).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol perfix plug on (b)(6) 2013.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device(s).As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the bard/davol perfix plug.As reported, the attorney alleges patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2013 - patient was diagnosed with bilateral inguinal hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of perfix plug (device #1 & #2).Per operative notes, ¿a direct hernia sac in the right inguinal region was identified and reduced.A small perfix plug (device #1) was placed using prolene sutures.A direct hernia sac in the left inguinal region was identified and reduced.A perfix plug (device #2) was placed using prolene sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2018 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent bilateral inguinal hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of 3dmax (device #3 & #4).Per operative notes, ¿a direct hernia defect was identified in the right inguinal region superior to pubic tubercle and reduced.The adhesions and scar tissue of prior mesh was taken down.A 3dmax (device #3) was placed and tacked.A large direct hernia defect was identified in the left inguinal region and reduced.The prior mesh was identified and adherent to cord structures were taken down.A 3dmax (device #3, #4) was placed and tacked.¿.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|